1995
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1693(94)04365-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-pot synthesis of CpRe(CO)2H2 and trans-CpRe(CO)2(SnPh3)2 from cis- and trans-CpRe(CO)2Br2 and Ph3SnH. Involvement of a radical-chain sequence in the formation of CpRe(CO)2H2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the OC−Re−CO angle in trans - 1 (99.8°) is larger than in cis - 1 (82.3°). The value of 99.8° for trans - 1 is quite similar to that observed in several other dicarbonyl rhenium complexes possessing the same stereochemistry: ( trans -CpRe(CO) 2 (C 6 HF 4 )Br, 99.7°; trans -CpRe(CO) 2 (SnPh 3 ) 2 , 100.5°; trans -(η 5 -C 5 Me 4 CH 2 Br)Re(CO) 2 (C 6 F 5 )Br, 100.5° 13 ). On the other hand, the carbonyl interbond angle of 82.3° found for cis - 1 can be compared to that determined for cis -Cp*Re(CO) 2 I 2 (78.5°), to our knowledge, the only other complex of this type studied by X-ray crystallography …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…As expected, the OC−Re−CO angle in trans - 1 (99.8°) is larger than in cis - 1 (82.3°). The value of 99.8° for trans - 1 is quite similar to that observed in several other dicarbonyl rhenium complexes possessing the same stereochemistry: ( trans -CpRe(CO) 2 (C 6 HF 4 )Br, 99.7°; trans -CpRe(CO) 2 (SnPh 3 ) 2 , 100.5°; trans -(η 5 -C 5 Me 4 CH 2 Br)Re(CO) 2 (C 6 F 5 )Br, 100.5° 13 ). On the other hand, the carbonyl interbond angle of 82.3° found for cis - 1 can be compared to that determined for cis -Cp*Re(CO) 2 I 2 (78.5°), to our knowledge, the only other complex of this type studied by X-ray crystallography …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…From the data for the carbonyl signals, an activation barrier of Δ G ⧧ = 7.4 ± 1.2 kcal/mol can be estimated for motion A in Figure . This value is in good agreement with the rotational barriers of other σ-donor/π-acceptor ligands on CpM(CO) 2 fragments such as substituted and unsubstituted olefins and acetylenes; in these cases the rotational barriers are 8−10 kcal/mol.
11 Intramolecular motions in complex 1 .
…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The solid‐state structure of this complex (Figure ) reveals the terminal disposition of the SnPh 3 group at the Re fragment, trans to the phosphanyl ligand ( δ P = 217 ppm, J P,Sn = 183 Hz), with a conventional Re–Sn single‐bond length of 2.7369(5) Å (ca. 2.73 Å in [ReCp(SnPh 3 ) 2 (CO) 2 ]) . The coordination sphere of the Re center is completed with three CO ligands arranged in a meridional disposition (retained in solution, as judged from the IR spectrum), and by a tightly bound acetonitrile ligand [ d Re–N = 2.152(5) Å].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%