2020
DOI: 10.1364/oe.387785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution for two independent parties

Abstract: Remote distribution of secret keys is a challenging task in quantum cryptography. A significant step in this direction is the measurement-device independence quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD). For two remote (or independent) parties Alice and Bob who initially no share secret information, the MDI-QKD enables them to share a secret key by the measurement of an untrusted relay. Unfortunately, the MDI-QKD yields the assumption that the devices of both Alice and Bob have to be trusted. Here, we show that QKD betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only assumption in MDI-QKD is that Alice and Bob trust their sources. Even this assumption can be relaxed with the aid of the device-independent QKD (DI-QKD) philosophy [121]- [123]. In contrast to the MDI-QKD protocol that is feasible to implement in practical 6 MDI implies that the security of QKD does not depend on the measurement device at the receiver side, that is, the MDI-QKD process remains secure even if the measurement device is controlled by an eavesdropper.…”
Section: Qkd Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only assumption in MDI-QKD is that Alice and Bob trust their sources. Even this assumption can be relaxed with the aid of the device-independent QKD (DI-QKD) philosophy [121]- [123]. In contrast to the MDI-QKD protocol that is feasible to implement in practical 6 MDI implies that the security of QKD does not depend on the measurement device at the receiver side, that is, the MDI-QKD process remains secure even if the measurement device is controlled by an eavesdropper.…”
Section: Qkd Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's efficiency is not optimal as it discards more than 50% of the results. Another 1SDI-QKD protocol has been published recently by Xin et al (2020) [38]. They did not consider the parameter estimation step where Eve's presence is detected.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers focus on considering the receiver measurement device, not only the detectors, as an uncharacterized device. They are called either 1SDI-QKD [33,5,7], which stands for one-sided-device-independent, RDI-QKD [15], which stands for receiver-device-independent. Xin et al (2020) recently published a 1SDI-QKD scheme [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are called either 1SDI-QKD [33,5,7], which stands for one-sided-device-independent, RDI-QKD [15], which stands for receiver-device-independent. Xin et al (2020) recently published a 1SDI-QKD scheme [33]. They ignored the parameter estimation stage in which Eve's existence is sensed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%