2014
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One size does not fit all: why universal decolonization strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in adult intensive care units may be inappropriate for neonatal intensive care units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high prevalence of mupirocin-resistant S. aureus strains was reported after the widespread use of mupirocin in adult ICU [18,19] but not in neonates so far [13,14]. In line with these reports, we did not detect mupirocin-resistant MSSA strains during the study period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A high prevalence of mupirocin-resistant S. aureus strains was reported after the widespread use of mupirocin in adult ICU [18,19] but not in neonates so far [13,14]. In line with these reports, we did not detect mupirocin-resistant MSSA strains during the study period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Hence, the higher prevalence and associated burden of MSSA infections versus MRSA infections suggests a potential clinical benefit for the establishment of an active surveillance protocol of the MSSA colonization of VLBWI. To date, recommendations for the surveillance of MSSA colonization in neonates are less defined, and the data concerning efficacy and safety are insufficient [18]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in other centers, up to 50% of neonates may be persistently colonized or recolonized by MRSA, and a fraction of patients may still develop a subsequent infection despite decolonization [11, 63, 69]. Notably, the current MRSA decolonization protocol largely stems from guidelines for adults [65], and robust evidence regarding its extrapolation to neonates is scarce [70]. Currently, the following questions on MRSA surveillance and decolonization in neonates are yet to be addressed: (1) the implementation of universal versus targeted active surveillance cultures in neonates at high risk for MRSA colonization and infection [10, 64], (2) the definition of optimum surveillance time points to better identify colonized neonates [10, 64], and (3) the benefit of screening extranasal sites for early identification of colonized infants [10, 16, 64].…”
Section: Treatment and Prevention Of Neonatal Mrsa Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the importance of new screening methods, such as polymerase chain reaction and whole-genome sequencing, needs to be defined [6, 7, 10, 16, 64]. Since MRSA resistant to mupirocin and antiseptics have been reported [18, 44, 71], the efficacy of nasal mupirocin application in primary and persistent MRSA decolonization warrants verification [10, 70, 72], Finally, potential adverse effects of antiseptic baths, such as skin irritation and toxicity [73], as well as nonantimicrobial strategies like maternal skin-to-skin contact for MRSA decolonization remain subjects of discussion [74]. …”
Section: Treatment and Prevention Of Neonatal Mrsa Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a study design is likely to be embraced by the neonatology community. 10 In addition, a larger future study could more fully assess the durability of decolonization, assess whether infected infants acquire new S. aureus strains or become infected with their colonizing strains, determine optimal Affiliations: 1. Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; 2.…”
Section: An Interdisciplinary Team Of Investigators At Johns Hopkinsmentioning
confidence: 99%