2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-stage posterior debridement and fusion combined with irrigation and drainage for the treatment of postoperative lumbar spondylodiscitis

Abstract: ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of one-stage posterior debridement, interbody fusion, and instrumentation, combined with irrigation and drainage, for treating lumbar spondylodiscitis.MethodsThe study included 23 patients (13 male and 10 female, mean age: 45 years) who had posterior debridement, interbody fusion, and instrumentation, followed by continuous closed irrigation and drainage for lumbar postoperative spondylodiscitis. The visual analog scale, Oswestry disability i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having to use drainage during posterior debriding to reduce the recurrence rate of infection implies that debridement via the single posterior approach is not sufficient. To reduce the recurrence rate, many orthopaedists have suggested radical debridement using the posterior approach, which theoretically results in excessive removal of healthy bone. Exposing via the OLIF corridor, the lesion can be clearly viewed and debrided up to the healthy bone, which results in precise debridement without any residual lesion or excessive removal of healthy bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having to use drainage during posterior debriding to reduce the recurrence rate of infection implies that debridement via the single posterior approach is not sufficient. To reduce the recurrence rate, many orthopaedists have suggested radical debridement using the posterior approach, which theoretically results in excessive removal of healthy bone. Exposing via the OLIF corridor, the lesion can be clearly viewed and debrided up to the healthy bone, which results in precise debridement without any residual lesion or excessive removal of healthy bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the best surgical approach remains controversial. An anterior only approach debridement, a posterior only approach debridement, and a combined anterior–posterior debridement have been reported; however, these approaches are associated with certain risks. Debridement through the posterior only approach damages the posterior structure, which finally results in instability of the spine and greater loss of sagittal balance .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posterior approach could give better kyphotic deformity correction and vertebral stabilization, less complications and less surgical invasiveness [16]. Meanwhile, the infected intervertebral discs, vertebral endplates, and vertebral body tissues could be adequately debrided through a posterior-only approach to assure the excellence of the radiographic and clinical results [13,15]. But a considerable portion of authors believed that the posterior-only approach has the drawbacks of insu cient removal of infected tissue compared with the anterior approach[26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anterior, posterior and combined approaches have been used for the treatment of spondylodiscitis [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these are very useful parameters for following the response to therapy [36]. Blood culture obtained during a fever spike are positive in upto onethird of patients and are 85% accurate in the identification of pathogen in case of postoperative discitis [31].…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%