One Step Away from 2030: An Assessment of the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the European Union

Barberà-Mariné, Maria-Glòria; Fabregat-Aibar, Laura; Ferreira, Valeria; Terceño, Antonio

doi:10.1057/s41287-024-00641-0

Eur J Dev Res

2024

DOI: 10.1057/s41287-024-00641-0

|View full text |Cite|

One Step Away from 2030: An Assessment of the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the European Union

Maria-Glòria Barberà-Mariné,

Laura Fabregat-Aibar,

Valeria Ferreira

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 102 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Knowledge and Emotions in Socioscientific Decision Making

Lacorte

2024

JETM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Socioscientific issues require practical decisions that use knowledge and emotions as inputs for the decision-making process. To examine how these resources influence decision-making, this investigation was conducted from a constructionist epistemological stance, a symbolic interactionism theoretical perspective, and a grounded theory methodology. Twenty-five informants were purposefully selected based on the study’s selection criteria. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, transcribed, and analyzed using Hennink and Kaiser’s strategies to achieve theoretical saturation. The analysis revealed that: (1) Knowledge of socioscientific issues was associated with emotion-related objects that elicited negative emotional responses from decision-makers; (2) These negative emotions triggered the use of related conceptual and contextual knowledge in generating decision alternatives; (3) Positive emotions motivated decision alternatives toward specific goals; (4) Decision alternatives contained both cognitive and affective components; and (5) Decisions were based on the appraisal of the overall cognitive and affective baggage of these alternatives. The findings underscored the importance of decision-makers enhancing their cognitive and affective resources and incorporating both when making practical decisions to effectively ad-dress socioscientific issues, thereby contributing to positive outcomes for individuals, societies, and the global community.

show abstract

Knowledge and Emotions in Socioscientific Decision Making

Lacorte

2024

JETM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

One Step Away from 2030: An Assessment of the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the European Union

Cited by 1 publication

References 102 publications

Knowledge and Emotions in Socioscientific Decision Making

Knowledge and Emotions in Socioscientific Decision Making

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About