2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-step co-culture fermentation strategy to produce high-content fructo-oligosaccharides

Abstract: An integrated process enabling the simultaneous production and purification of fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) was explored. A co-culture fermentation with Aspergillus ibericus (used as FOS producer strain) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae YIL162 W (for small saccharides removal) was optimized. Inoculation conditions of S. cerevisiae, fermentative broth composition, temperature and pH were optimized by experimental design. Yeast extract concentration and temperature were the most significant variables affecting FOS … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microbial treatment is an increasingly attractive solution for the purification and enrichment of oligosaccharides from a crude preparation [23,32,35,[58][59][60]. Most previous studies involved sequential fermentation (or co-fermentation) with yeast such as S. cerevisae, K. lactis, and Pichia pastoris to remove the small sugars, increasing the purity and content of oligosaccharides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial treatment is an increasingly attractive solution for the purification and enrichment of oligosaccharides from a crude preparation [23,32,35,[58][59][60]. Most previous studies involved sequential fermentation (or co-fermentation) with yeast such as S. cerevisae, K. lactis, and Pichia pastoris to remove the small sugars, increasing the purity and content of oligosaccharides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in a medium with high glucose, the SUC2 is repressed and the yeast starts consuming mainly glucose instead of sucrose. In order to better understand the impact of both microorganisms on the fermentation mixture, the use of a yeast strain with a repressed SUC2 gene, such as S. cerevisiae YIL162 W (as reported by [14]), was suggested [26].…”
Section: Fos Production In a Bioreactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different approaches have mainly been used: (i) systems consisting of two mixed enzymes, e.g. β-fructofuranosidase with glucose oxidase [4,10,11]; (ii) co-culture systems with two microorganisms, one FOS-producer and the second a small saccharides consumer: Aspergillus japonicus and Pichia pastoris [12], A. japonicus and Pichia heimii immobilised in calcium-alginate beads [13], and Aspergillus ibericus and S. cerevisiae YIL162 W (with the gene responsible for sucrose hydrolysis disrupted) [14]. In recent work, a co-culture of A. pullulans with Saccharomyces cerevisiae was tested; the yeast was able to reduce the amount of small sugars in the mixture, although the amount of FOS produced also decreased [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FOS are then produced under controlled conditions with the extracted enzymes using sucrose as the substrate [14][15][16]. During the one-stage process, FOS are biosynthesized from fungi in bioreactors using either immobilized or free whole cells as biocatalysts [4,6,[17][18][19]. The fermentative production of FOS using the one-stage process is advantageous when compared with the two-stage process because the step of purification of FOS-producing enzyme from cell extracts can be eliminated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%