2018
DOI: 10.3390/met8100741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One Step Hydrothermal Synthesis of Magnesium Silicate Impregnated Palm Shell Waste Activated Carbon for Copper Ion Removal

Abstract: Magnesium silicate impregnated onto palm-shell waste activated carbon (PPAC) underwent mild hydrothermal treatment under one-pot synthesis, designated as PPAC-MC. Various impregnation ratios from 25 to 300% of MgSiO 3 onto PPAC were tested. High levels of MgSiO 3 led to high Cu(II) adsorption capacity. A ratio of 1:1 (PPAC-MS 100) was considered optimum because of its chemical stability in solution. The maximum adsorption capacity of PPAC-MS 100 for Cu(II) obtained by isotherm experiments was 369 mg g −1 . The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained spectrum shows two main peaks centered at around 933 eV and 953 eV which can be attributed with Cu 2p 3/2 and 2p 1/2 , respectively. In addition, Cu 2p 3/2 peak exhibits a shoulder band that could be indicating that the Cu 2+ components are different in chemical environment [27,28] as a previously reported. These observed peaks appeared at ∼934.3 eV and ∼932.6 eV and can be assigned to octa-coordinated of Cu 2+ ions and tetra-coordinated of Cu + -Cu 0 species [27,28].…”
Section: Equilibrium Isothermssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained spectrum shows two main peaks centered at around 933 eV and 953 eV which can be attributed with Cu 2p 3/2 and 2p 1/2 , respectively. In addition, Cu 2p 3/2 peak exhibits a shoulder band that could be indicating that the Cu 2+ components are different in chemical environment [27,28] as a previously reported. These observed peaks appeared at ∼934.3 eV and ∼932.6 eV and can be assigned to octa-coordinated of Cu 2+ ions and tetra-coordinated of Cu + -Cu 0 species [27,28].…”
Section: Equilibrium Isothermssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In addition, Cu 2p 3/2 peak exhibits a shoulder band that could be indicating that the Cu 2+ components are different in chemical environment [27,28] as a previously reported. These observed peaks appeared at ∼934.3 eV and ∼932.6 eV and can be assigned to octa-coordinated of Cu 2+ ions and tetra-coordinated of Cu + -Cu 0 species [27,28]. It should be noted it is difficult to distinguish between Cu + and Cu 0 peaks, since the Cu 2p binding energies of both species are very close [29].…”
Section: Equilibrium Isothermssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The obtained spectrum showed two main peaks, centered at approximately 933 eV and 953 eV, which could be attributed to Cu 2p 3/2 and 2p 1/2 , respectively. Additionally, the Cu 2p 3/2 peak exhibited a shoulder band, which could indicate that the Cu 2+ components were different in chemical environment, as a previously reported (Li et al 2015;Choong et al 2018). These observed peaks appeared at approximately 934.3 eV and 932.6 eV and could be assigned to octa-coordination of Cu 2+ ions and tetracoordination of Cu + -Cu 0 species (Li et al 2015;Choong et al 2018).…”
Section: Xps Analysissupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Centrifugation, sedimentation, filtration, and other traditional separation methods deem to be ineffective and time consuming. On the other hand, magnetic GO (mGO) is synthesized via impregnation or co-precipitation methods [23][24][25][26][27] and can be easily separated by the aid of magnetic materials like Fe 3 O 4 or Fe 3 S 4. mGO is synthesized via impregnation or co-precipitation methods [23][24][25][26][27]. In the co-precipitation method, mGO is synthesized via the hydrothermal process by an in-situ reduction/decomposition of a metal precursor such as Fe 3 O 4, FeSO 4 , Fe(NO) 3 , or iron acetate on the surface of dispersed GO under sonication, see Figure 4.…”
Section: Magnetic Nanocomposites and Nanocomposites With Other Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centrifugation, sedimentation, filtration, and other traditional separation methods deem to be ineffective and time consuming. On the other hand, magnetic GO (mGO) is synthesized via impregnation or co-precipitation methods [23][24][25][26][27] and can be easily separated by the aid of magnetic materials like Fe3O4 or Fe3S4. mGO is synthesized via impregnation or co-precipitation methods [23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: 21magnetic Nanocomposites and Nanocomposites With Other mentioning
confidence: 99%