2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-step liquid chromatographic method for the determination of oxytetracycline in fish muscle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is well known [9,24] that this technique suffer from batch-to-batch variability and column clogging, and is invariably time consuming to use, in addition to adding to the cost of the sample preparation.…”
Section: Sample Extraction and Clean-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well known [9,24] that this technique suffer from batch-to-batch variability and column clogging, and is invariably time consuming to use, in addition to adding to the cost of the sample preparation.…”
Section: Sample Extraction and Clean-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also biologically active in humans. This particular antibiotic is the main focus of this study, for, it is widely used in aquaculture, mainly as a growth promoter and to prevent infection (Coyne et al 2004). Lalumera et al (2004) found that 75% of the given drug is released from the body of the fish through secretions as a non-metabolite molecule, which directly discharges to the aquatic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, other techniques, such as chromatography or electrophoresis [9], have been proposed to overcome these shortcomings, and liquid chromatography (LC) is the most frequently approach used. In relation to detection methods, they are diverse and include UV [10,11] or fluorescence detection [12,13]. However, Public Health Agencies, based on European Union guidelines, rely on the detection by mass spectrometry (MS) for confirmation of antibiotics in foodstuffs [14], considering that it provides more reliable identification and confirmation of these analytes than conventional detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%