2008
DOI: 10.1214/009053607000000802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-step sparse estimates in nonconcave penalized likelihood models

Abstract: Fan & Li (2001) propose a family of variable selection methods via penalized likelihood using concave penalty functions. The nonconcave penalized likelihood estimators enjoy the oracle properties, but maximizing the penalized likelihood function is computationally challenging, because the objective function is nondifferentiable and nonconcave. In this article we propose a new unified algorithm based on the local linear approximation (LLA) for maximizing the penalized likelihood for a broad class of concave pen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
918
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 881 publications
(930 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
918
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, we apply the Local Linear Approximation algorithm (LLA) [Zou and Li, 2008] to solve it: start from an initial solution β…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practice, we apply the Local Linear Approximation algorithm (LLA) [Zou and Li, 2008] to solve it: start from an initial solution β…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local linear approximation (LLA) algorithm can be applied to produce a certain local minimum for any fixed initial solution; see Zou and Li [2008], Fan et al [2012] and references therein for details.…”
Section: Basic Version Of Cardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous non-convex penalties and algorithms have been proposed to outperform 1 -norm regularization for the estimation of sparse signals e.g., [8], [10], [12], [13], [15], [33], [34], [39], [43], [51], [53]. However, few of these methods maintain the convexity of the cost function.…”
Section: A Relation To Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penalty functions can be approximated by the local quadratic approximation advocated in [15] ( ) The minimization problem in Step 1 and Step 2 is a quadratic function after above these approximations, and can be solved in closed form. In our implementation, we set 6 10 − =  .…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%