One third of physicians discuss exit strategies with patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Results from nationwide surveys among German and Polish neurologists

Abstract

ObjectiveThis paper examines neurologists’ approaches to exit strategies (ESs), such as euthanasia and physician‐assisted suicide, in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (PALS) in two European countries.MethodsIn a nationwide anonymous survey, we collected responses from 237 Polish and 228 German neurologists, focusing on their practices and beliefs about ESs, as well as their viewpoints on life‐sustaining measures (LSMs) (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, non‐invasive, and invasive ventilation). To analyze the data, we employed statistical methods, including Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis, chi‐square tests, Spearman's rank correlation, and multiple regression analysis.ResultsOne third of the neurologists initiated the discussion about ESs with PALS. Half were ready to have this conversation upon patient's request. Age, gender, religiousness, and nationality were closely associated with this approach. One in 9 neurologists received a request to terminate an LSM, whereas 1 in 10 to implement an ES. German neurologists and palliative care trainees acquired both demands more commonly. Neurologists quoted a low quality of life, decreased mood, and being a burden to the family/closest ones as primary reasons for a wish to hasten death among PALS. Although the majority expressed a willingness to terminate an LSM at a request of the patient, most opposed the legalization of euthanasia. Younger and less religious individuals were more likely to favor accepting euthanasia.ConclusionNeurologists vary significantly in their approaches to terminal care. Complex relationships exist among personal indices, shared beliefs, and current practices.