2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3153915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One‐to‐Many Relationship Based Kullback Leibler Divergence against Malicious Users in Cooperative Spectrum Sensing

Abstract: The centralized cooperative spectrum sensing (CSS) allows unlicensed users to share their local sensing observations with the fusion center (FC) for sensing the licensed user spectrum. Although collaboration leads to better sensing, malicious user (MU) participation in CSS results in performance degradation. The proposed technique is based on Kullback Leibler Divergence (KLD) algorithm for mitigating the MUs attack in CSS. The secondary users (SUs) inform FC about the primary user (PU) spectrum availability by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, based on the flexible sensing time slot, τ p s using the KLD award score, each CR-IoT user to sense the PU licensed spectrum more efficiently. Now, we can calculate the KLD award score, δ of the proposed ED method using the flexible sensing time slot, τ p s with interference constraints for scenario II which is defined as between the two normally distributed functions f (ψ) and f (ψ) [5,50,51,59] as follows:…”
Section: Analysis Of Flexible Sensing Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, based on the flexible sensing time slot, τ p s using the KLD award score, each CR-IoT user to sense the PU licensed spectrum more efficiently. Now, we can calculate the KLD award score, δ of the proposed ED method using the flexible sensing time slot, τ p s with interference constraints for scenario II which is defined as between the two normally distributed functions f (ψ) and f (ψ) [5,50,51,59] as follows:…”
Section: Analysis Of Flexible Sensing Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [50], the authors used the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) technique to calculate the weight value for each CR-IoT user according to their local sensing result and the FC uses the local sensing results and weight value of each CR-IoT user to make the final global decision about the appearance and non-appearance of the PU's signal in CR-IoT networks. In [51], each CR-IoT generates their local spectrum sensing result about the appearance and non-appearance of the PU's signal in the network. The FC collected the local detection results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches have been reported to defense MUs attack based on weight assigned in recent literature. In [10], according to the difference between the energy of CU and the average energy of all CUs, each CU was given a Kullback Leibler divergence (KLD) score to assign weights for the sensing reports of CUs before sensing data fusion at the FC. The MUs were assigned low weights, whereas the HUs were assigned high weights.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such existing techniques of against MUs are limit to some unrealistic assumptions that are easily violated in future or realistic spectrum sensing: 1) The attack ways are assumed to be identical and fixed in [9]. 2) The underlying distribution of PU signal and noise are assumed to be known [10]. Both of assumptions are easily violated in realistic spectrum sensing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [36,37], the authors used the KLD technique to evaluate the dissimilarity in the probability distribution functions under the presence and absence hypotheses of the PU's signal. In [38], each CR-IoT user provided an FC with information about their local spectrum observations of the licensed spectrum. The FC collected the local sensing results and made its global decision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%