2003
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.23-05-01956.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-Trial Memory for Object-Place Associations after Separate Lesions of Hippocampus and Posterior Parahippocampal Region in the Monkey

Abstract: In earlier studies of one-trial spatial memory in monkeys (Parkinson et al., 1988; Angeli et al., 1993), severe and chronic memory impairment for both object-place association and place alone was found after ablation of the hippocampal formation. The results appeared to provide the first clear-cut evidence in the monkey of the essential role of the hippocampus in spatial memory, but that interpretation neglected the inclusion in the lesion of the underlying posterior parahippocampal region. To determine the se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
161
2
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
13
161
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This temporal profile suggests that perirhinal and other visual cortical regions can maintain visual memories accurately during intermediate spans and that the effects of perirhinal damage cannot be attributed solely to the disruption of signals going to and coming from the hippocampus. It also indicates that hippocampal deficits may be more difficult to detect in DMTS tasks that do not generate good, long delay performance (10,11,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This temporal profile suggests that perirhinal and other visual cortical regions can maintain visual memories accurately during intermediate spans and that the effects of perirhinal damage cannot be attributed solely to the disruption of signals going to and coming from the hippocampus. It also indicates that hippocampal deficits may be more difficult to detect in DMTS tasks that do not generate good, long delay performance (10,11,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the hippocampus in this form of memory, on the other hand, cannot be as clearly inferred from existing data. For example, hippocampal damage in humans impairs performance on nonverbal recognition tasks, but the results in nonhuman primates are conflicting as to whether selective hippocampal damage impairs performance on visual recognition memory tasks (9)(10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The converse results were observed in the postrhinal cortex, that is, a response to spatial rearrangement but not to changing objects. In addition, while object recognition is impaired following perirhinal damage, object-location recognition is deficient following postrhinal damage in rats (Gaffan et al, 2004) and monkeys (Malkova and Mishkin, 2003;Alvarado and Bachevalier, 2005). Similarly, Norman and Eacott (2005) reported data suggesting that perirhinal lesions led to greater memory impairment for object pairings, whereas postrhinal lesions led to greater impairment in memory for the spatial context in which an object was presented.…”
Section: Parahippocampal/postrhinal Cortex and Mecmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was hypothesized that the D 1 -like antagonist SCH23390 would impair performance on the SOSS task, which is a more complex spatial working memory task. It was further predicted that the D 2 -selective antagonist raclopride would preferentially impair performance on the vsPAL task due to previous reports of a loss of D 2 expression in inferior temporal regions (Joyce et al 1998) which have been associated with object-in-place memory in monkeys (Malkova and Mishkin 2003), and findings of impaired memory after and D 2 -like antagonists (Arnsten et al 1995;Mehta et al 2001). Effects on PR, RTT and BMS tasks are predicted to be similar for the two compounds on the basis of prior results with drug-or food-reinforced responding (Nader et al 2002;Woolverton and Virus 1989) and motor function assays in monkeys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%