2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2016.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One versus one multi-class classification fusion using optimizing decision directed acyclic graph for predicting listing status of companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the traditional fusion, an approach to inject the knowledge to derive the actual information was proposed in study [99] ; it was developed as a defusing technique to infer the relevant base data from the aggregated historical data. Another application of fusion was given as a one-vs-one scheme with optimizing decision directed acyclic graph (ODDAG) to predict the listing status of companies [100] . One of the recent applications included the uncertain possibility–probability information fusion for stock selection based on the relative closeness of the alternative stocks [101] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the traditional fusion, an approach to inject the knowledge to derive the actual information was proposed in study [99] ; it was developed as a defusing technique to infer the relevant base data from the aggregated historical data. Another application of fusion was given as a one-vs-one scheme with optimizing decision directed acyclic graph (ODDAG) to predict the listing status of companies [100] . One of the recent applications included the uncertain possibility–probability information fusion for stock selection based on the relative closeness of the alternative stocks [101] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective coding matrix would be beneficial for the ECOC algorithm. Common coding strategies fall into two categories [22]: (1) Data-independent category, including One-VS-All (OVA), One-VS-One (OVO) [23], and ordinal ECOC [18], where the coding matrices are predefined based on a simple partition of the label space, and without considering the relationship between the data features and data distribution; (2) Data-dependent category, such as D-ECOC [24] and ECOC-ONE [25], where the coding matrixes are generated based on the data distribution; ECOC-MDC [19] uses data complexity [26] to guide the generation of the coding matrix. In contrast, the data-dependent ECOC algorithms use the inherent information of the data to guide the generation of the coding matrices, which are intuitively better suited to handle difficult multi-classification tasks.…”
Section: Background a Overview Of Error-correcting Output Codes mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Micro averaging does not provide an accurate measure of performance when the instances are not equally distributed over the classes (most instances belong to one class). Unlike Micro averaging, Macro averaging provides meaningful performance measure despite that data is not equally representative of all classes (imbalanced classes) [58]. Therefore, Macro averaging is used as a measure to evaluate the multi-class model performance in this study.…”
Section: Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%