2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-009-0105-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-year change in the second metacarpal bone mass associated with menopause nutrition and physical activity

Abstract: Second metacarpal bone changed by menopause, nutrition and physical activity similar with other bone site presented in the previous studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiogrammetry quantifies the amplitude or geometry of cortical bone in tubular bones. It is ineffectual to diagnose osteoporosis at the individual level, but perseveres as a useful tool to evaluate cortical bone loss in epidemiological studies (Yasaku et al 2009;Curate 2014a). Conventional radiogrammetry was used to assess cortical parameters (diaphysis total width [DTW], medullary width [MW] and cortical index [MCI]) at the second metacarpal midpoint (Ives and Brickley 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiogrammetry quantifies the amplitude or geometry of cortical bone in tubular bones. It is ineffectual to diagnose osteoporosis at the individual level, but perseveres as a useful tool to evaluate cortical bone loss in epidemiological studies (Yasaku et al 2009;Curate 2014a). Conventional radiogrammetry was used to assess cortical parameters (diaphysis total width [DTW], medullary width [MW] and cortical index [MCI]) at the second metacarpal midpoint (Ives and Brickley 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…99,100 They also suggest that maintenance of regular physical activity over time results in attenuated bone loss, compared with reduced physical activity or consistently sedentary behavior. 97,98,101,102 …”
Section: Physical Activity and Bone Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiogrammetry quantifies the amplitude or geometry of cortical bone in tubular bones (Ives and Brickley, 2004). It is ineffective to evaluate osteoporosis at the individual level, but endures as a valuable tool to assess cortical bone loss in epidemiological settings (Shepherd et al, 2005;Yasaku et al, 2009). At the same time, radiogrammetry is still widely used in studies concerned with specific pathological conditions (Böttcher and Pfeil, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%