bBeagles received placebo or ospA-and ospB-negative Borrelia burgdorferi before a tick challenge. A total of 28 (41%) ticks and skin biopsy specimens from each control dog (n ؍ 10) contained B. burgdorferi. In contrast, 12 (19%) ticks recovered from the vaccine recipients (n ؍ 10) were infected (P ؍ 0.0077), and 5 dogs yielded spirochetes from the skin biopsy specimens (P ؍ 0.0325). In addition, 9 (90%) placebo recipients and 4 (40%) vaccine recipients developed joint abnormalities (P ؍ 0.0573). Therefore, vaccination with the ospA-and ospB-negative spirochete provided significant protection against Lyme disease. L yme disease, due primarily in the United States to the transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi from infected Ixodes ticks, causes significant morbidity in canines. However, infected dogs rarely develop acute illness (1); instead, the illness manifests as chronic subclinical polyarthritis and/or periarteritis (2, 3) that may progress to frank arthritis (4, 5). In addition, Labrador retrievers, golden retrievers, and Shetland sheepdogs appear more susceptible to kidney nephropathy (6).Canine vaccines that provide protection by inducing antiOspA borreliacidal antibodies to kill B. burgdorferi in the midgut as the infected tick ingests blood (7, 8) have been commercially available for several decades, and the approach has been partially effective (9, 10). However, vaccinated dogs may still become infected, because the expression of OspA is downregulated immediately after the infected tick begins taking a blood meal (11), and the ticks may also transmit ospA-negative Lyme spirochetes (12). In addition, borreliacidal antibodies specific for OspA are genospecies specific (13,14), which is less problematic in the United States, where B. burgdorferi predominates, but significantly impacts efficacy in Europe and Asia, where other genospecies, such as Borrelia garinii, may infect canines (15,16).Researchers therefore sought to overcome the shortcomings of the traditional vaccines by developing a bivalent bacterin comprising a traditional OspA-expressing B. burgdorferi strain and a unique ospA-and ospB-negative B. burgdorferi strain that expressed high levels of OspC. Subsequent studies (17, 18) confirmed that the approach provided a high level of protection against canine Lyme disease for at least 1 year. In addition, the investigators demonstrated that the bacterin induced significant amounts of anti-OspC borreliacidal antibodies (17) and postulated that the high level of protection was likely due at least in part to the inclusion of the OspC-producing spirochete. We therefore examined this possibility more critically by evaluating the protection afforded by vaccination with only the ospA-and ospB-negative B. burgdorferi strain.Vaccination and tick challenge. Two groups (n ϭ 10 in each group) of 8-week-old laboratory-reared beagle puppies were randomized without regard to sex, vaccinated by subcutaneous injection with a 1-ml dose of bacterin or placebo, and boostered after 21 days by subcutaneous injecti...