2009
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2008.147827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

One-year survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia, 1995-2006

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding lends further support that reports of increased survival for CDH may be because of selection of patients who are stable for transfer and eventual surgical repair. Our survival rate of 66% for a nationwide sample is significantly lower than the 82% to 93% survival reported from single tertiary care centers [11][12][13][14][15][16] revealing that a hidden mortality for CDH exists in the United States. In contrast to other studies, however, we found no difference in survival for hospitals with the highest surgical case volumes [11,14].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding lends further support that reports of increased survival for CDH may be because of selection of patients who are stable for transfer and eventual surgical repair. Our survival rate of 66% for a nationwide sample is significantly lower than the 82% to 93% survival reported from single tertiary care centers [11][12][13][14][15][16] revealing that a hidden mortality for CDH exists in the United States. In contrast to other studies, however, we found no difference in survival for hospitals with the highest surgical case volumes [11,14].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Recent studies from single tertiary care centers have reported improved survival ranging from 82% to 93% with management strategies emphasizing inhaled nitric oxide, permissive hypercapnea, high frequency oscillatory ventilation, selective use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), delayed surgical repair, and treatment at high volume centers [11][12][13][14][15][16]. In contrast, current population-based studies from the United Kingdom and Australia report significantly lower survival (54%-56%) of live-born infants despite new therapies for CDH [4,17,18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survivors were operated on at a median age of 2.0 (range, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] days; 77% of them required a patch augmented repair. Full enteral feeding was possible at 26 (range, 5-150) days of age.…”
Section: Postnatal Morbidity Indices and Their Predictors In The Fetomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is associated with significant mortality and morbidity (Abdullah et al, 2009). Survival data for CDH are conflicting; a few centers reported 82% to 93% survival rate (Javid et al, 2004;Grushka et al, 2009;Mettauer et al, 2009) while others had significantly less figures (54%-56%) (Colvin et al, 2005;Levison et al, 2006). This divergence in survival data has been attributed to case selection bias at single tertiary care institutions because as many as 35% of live-born infants with CDH do not survive to transport resulting in a hidden mortality for this condition (Harrison et al, 1978;Colvin et al;, V.K.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%