2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ongoing Challenges to Develop High Concentration Monoclonal Antibody-based Formulations for Subcutaneous Administration: Quo Vadis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are, however, certain limitations with s.c. administration. By general consensus, a single injection volume should be limited to < 2 mL, determined by the available subcutaneous space and sensation of tolerable pain by the patient, 2 although investigation of injection volumes >2.5 mL has been suggested. 3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are, however, certain limitations with s.c. administration. By general consensus, a single injection volume should be limited to < 2 mL, determined by the available subcutaneous space and sensation of tolerable pain by the patient, 2 although investigation of injection volumes >2.5 mL has been suggested. 3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Neergaard, 2013 20 3 IgG1 and IgG4 at 200 mg/mL in diverse buffers at pH 4–9 plus NaCl kD (DLS), Zeta potential for effective pI; Calculated values: Net charge and theoretical pI kD (if negative) and net charge (if low at pI) indicate potential high viscosity. Zeta potential predicts pH of maximum viscosity Binabaji, 2015 19 1 IgG1 at max 269 mg/mL, pH 5–7 in diverse buffers; plus excipients sucrose, proline, arginine-HCl, NaCl Net protein charge and zeta potential by (electrophoretic light scattering); B2, B3 (osmotic pressure data) B3 shows a strong linear correlation (R 2 =0.97) with the viscosity parameter from the Mooney equation Woldeyes, 2019 28 4 mAbs at 1–150 mg/mL, pH 5–8 in diverse buffers, plus NaCl A2 (SLS), S q=0 (SLS), kD (DLS), H q=0 (DLS/SLS) kD and A2, determined at low mAb concentration, are often not qualitative predictive of viscosity at high concentration. PPI are complex especially at high concentration and influence viscosity in nonlinear fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immanent to the at times high individual dose levels, compared to mAbs in immunology for example (refer to disease area archetype 1), developing subcutaneous injection regimens was initially complicated due to a number of technical challenges. With the introduction of methodologies to achieve high-concentration solutions (Mahler et al 2009;Jiskoot et al 2022) and the co-administration of the dispersion enhancer hyaluronidase (Frost 2007), the first moves were made to reduce the overall dosing volume and to facilitate spreading of an injected fluid in the interstitial space. Approved high-volume subcutaneous treatments that apply these technologies can maintain the infrequent dosing regimen of the initially marketed intravenous presentations.…”
Section: Disease Area Archetype 3-market With Variety Of Established ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1, 2, 3), numbers of filters (32,64,128,256) and kernel sizes (3,5,7). The MAE values of the best validation model were used to evaluate the model performance.…”
Section: Machine and Deep Learning Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 At high protein concentrations, some antibodies might exhibit elevated viscosity beyond the syringeability limit. 3 However, most antibodies have low viscosity at low concentrations. 4 It is a challenge to identify potential problematic antibodies during discovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%