1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02764967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Onl p-complemented copies in Orlicz spaces II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of Banach lattices, a useful variant of strict singularity is the following [28]: given a Banach lattice E and a Banach space Y , an operator T : E → Y is called disjointly strictly singular if it is not invertible on any subspace of E generated by a disjoint sequence.…”
Section: Domination By Strictly Singular Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of Banach lattices, a useful variant of strict singularity is the following [28]: given a Banach lattice E and a Banach space Y , an operator T : E → Y is called disjointly strictly singular if it is not invertible on any subspace of E generated by a disjoint sequence.…”
Section: Domination By Strictly Singular Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It involves the use of a lattice version of the class of strictly singular operators, introduced by Hernández and Rodríguez-Salinas in [11]. Precisely, a bounded operator T from a Banach lattice E into a Banach space Y is said to be disjointly strictly singular if there is no disjoint sequence of non-null vectors (x n ) n in E such that the restriction of T to the subspace [x n ] spanned by the sequence (x n ) n is an isomorphism.…”
Section: Vol 55 (2006) Strictly Singular and Regular Integral Operatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we show that the convexity and concavity assumptions in the preceding two theorems are in fact essential. To see this, fix 1 < p < ∞ and take any symmetric Banach sequence space E strictly contained in p , but such that the inclusion map E → p is not strictly singular, i.e., it is an isomorphism on some infinitedimensional subspace of E (for Orlicz sequence spaces E of this type we refer to [8] and [9]; see also [14, 4.c.3]). Recall the well-known fact that any separable p -space is complementably minimal (i.e., each of its infinite-dimensional subspaces contains a subspace which is isomorphic to p and complemented in p ).…”
Section: Theorem 42 Let E and F Be Symmetric Banach Sequence Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%