2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online activists vs. Kraft foods: A case of social media hijacking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
38
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This affects producers' and manufacturers' production and marketing strategies and these companies' need to increasingly adopt a market‐oriented approach (Kayser et al, ; Lehmann, Reiche, & Schiefer, ; Rollin, Kennedy, & Wills, ; Rutsaert et al, ). Focusing on communication, given the global easy access to information, media influencers, and word of mouth campaigns increasingly contribute to force changes in these companies' production and marketing strategies (Veil, Reno, Freihaut, & Oldham, ). In particular, social media and user‐generated contents are able to influence companies' reputation according to the capability of providing appropriate, on time, and precise information directly to consumers (De Vries, Gensler, & Leeflang, ; Heinonen, ; Ott & Theunissen, ; Rutsaert et al, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This affects producers' and manufacturers' production and marketing strategies and these companies' need to increasingly adopt a market‐oriented approach (Kayser et al, ; Lehmann, Reiche, & Schiefer, ; Rollin, Kennedy, & Wills, ; Rutsaert et al, ). Focusing on communication, given the global easy access to information, media influencers, and word of mouth campaigns increasingly contribute to force changes in these companies' production and marketing strategies (Veil, Reno, Freihaut, & Oldham, ). In particular, social media and user‐generated contents are able to influence companies' reputation according to the capability of providing appropriate, on time, and precise information directly to consumers (De Vries, Gensler, & Leeflang, ; Heinonen, ; Ott & Theunissen, ; Rutsaert et al, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on communication, given the global easy access to information, media influencers, and word of mouth campaigns increasingly contribute to force changes in these companies' production and marketing strategies (Veil, Reno, Freihaut, & Oldham, 2014). In particular, social media and user-generated contents are able to influence companies' reputation according to the capability of providing appropriate, on time, and precise information directly to consumers (De Vries, Gensler, & Leeflang, 2012;Heinonen, 2011;Ott & Theunissen, 2015;Rutsaert et al, 2014).…”
Section: Marketing and Social Media Along The Agri-food Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the era of global, the social issue that already represented much in the media is about hoaxes. Some researches has studied about it from hoax as message of a campaign [15], to hoax in terms of conspiration [16].…”
Section: Mass Media and Online Media In The Global Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CSR, warriors do not expect redress (Donoghue and de Klerk, 2009) or official regret and apology from the firm; instead, they expect a more interpersonal, thoughtful response beyond simple 'window dressing' (Kesavan and Bernacchi, 2013;Einwiller and Steilen, 2015) -especially given that, as posited by Brenton (2013), consumers who protest on the web are those who can be more supportive of social causes. However, the use of exaggerated and untruthful accusations detracts from the legitimization of warrior users and alienates them from purposeful activism (Veil et al, 2015). Warrior eWOM remain as a rhetorical consumer strategy that intend to move other consumers to question the market and the consumerist ideology (Odou and De Pechpeyrou, 2010).…”
Section: Warrior Ewommentioning
confidence: 99%