2009
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online assessment of patients' views on hospital performances using Rasch model's KIDMAP diagram

Abstract: Background: To overcome the drawback of individual item-by-item box plots of disclosure for patient views on healthcare service quality, we propose to inspect interrelationships among items that measure a common entity. A visual diagram on the Internet is developed to provide thorough information for hospitals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The person separation reliability (similar to Cronbach alpha) calculated from the original paper [5] was 0.94 (mean 2.64, SD 2.09). Based on this number, the CAT stop rule for measurement of standardized error was determined to be 0.51(SD × sqrt(1 – alpha) = 2.09 × sqrt(1 – 0.94)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The person separation reliability (similar to Cronbach alpha) calculated from the original paper [5] was 0.94 (mean 2.64, SD 2.09). Based on this number, the CAT stop rule for measurement of standardized error was determined to be 0.51(SD × sqrt(1 – alpha) = 2.09 × sqrt(1 – 0.94)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Unidimensionality, local independence, item fit, and differential item functioning using the Rasch model to investigate these criteria have been previously reported [5]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) different from the traditional monochrome diagram [35, 3638] or KIDMAP solely for dichotomous scales [25]. More information has been included in the colorful KIDMAP: all person distributions and dispersions along all items, Z-scores displaying the most unexpected items, and the individual person location points on items suitable for polytomous and continuous variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAT, which is based on Item Response Theory (IRT), is a test administration method that tailors the assessment to the latent-trait level of the examinee (Cella, Gershon, Lai, & Choi, 2007;Jette, Haley, Ni, Olarsch, & Moed, 2008;Lord, 1990). CAT has attracted much attention because of its better control of item exposure and lower cost of item development (Chien, Wang, Wang & Lin, 2009;Jette et al, 2008). CAT overcomes the shortcomings of the two traditional forms of standardized assessments, both the burdens associated with lengthy assessments and the loss of precision and reliability of shorter fixed-form assessments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%