Online e-learning and cognitive disabilities: A systematic review

Abstract

For decades now, as the issue of social progress has come to the fore, the drive to improve access to education has been behind the growth in research into e-learning. The current systematic literature review raised the question of the existence of studies addressing the specific needs of persons with cognitive impairments. Indeed, e-learning is expected to be one of the critical tools for improving access to education and ultimately aiding social inclusion. The systematic literature review was performed through a four-step process including an exhaustive search of scientific literature databases, the selection of studies through exclusion and inclusion criteria, and literature analysis and synthesis. The main results are: 1) a lack of e-learning studies addressing the issue of accessibility for people with cognitive impairments (N=29) with a purpose dominated by design guidelines rather than effectiveness assessment; 2) a weak inclusion of accessibility standards (N=5) and 3) a weak inclusion of special education findings (N=3), with a focus on specific neuropsychological disorders or syndromes (dyslexia, ADHD, etc.) rather than on impairments of cognitive function (attention, memory, etc.) as promoted by the International Classification of Functioning (World Health Organization, 2001); 4) the identification of five families of accessibility function (adaptive systems, game elements, accessible content, virtual agents and accessible interfaces or environments) and their dependency with activity-domain of learning. Results are discussed in terms of both design and assessment recommendations, promoting a multidisciplinary approach combining educational sciences, cognitive sciences and computer sci

A synthesis of systematic review research on emerging learning environments and technologies

“…As the field of learning technology expanded, naturally, there was increasing attention into learning with technology in the field of special education. This has resulted in systematic reviews focusing on studying the use of various learning technologies including online technologies with learners with cognitive disabilities (Cinquin et al 2019 ), support tools for those with autism spectrum disorders (Aresti-Bartolome and Garcia-Zapirain 2014 ), and mobile technologies to assist individuals with developmental disabilities (Kagohara et al 2013 ).…”

Comparative Study of the Development of Android-Based Flipped Classroom Model between Jeddah and Indonesia

“…Electronic books (e-book) regularly comprehend multimedia structures such as active portraits, contextual resonances, and music that show laterally through the edition that qualify learners to study further intensely associated with plain or standing non-multimedia enhanced script [25]. Through Moodle mobile learning, this multimedia additions that in a straight line associate to the stated material are exposed to add to education, e.g., in section and verbal comprehension such as heeding toward multimedia improved stories progresses comprehension equaled to attending the sections using non-multimedia attachments [26].…”

Accessibility Assessment for Online Education Tools: Towards Accessible Principles for a Mexican University

“…For the reasons previously exposed, written language is an alternative way of presenting content to deaf readers and therefore it should be used, but it should not be assumed that deaf readers will understand them entirely. Cognitive, learning, and neurological disabilities are also known as "invisible disabilities", because they are not apparent or well understood outside medical or specialized environments [7]. People with this type of disability may be intimidated by long texts and complex contents; they may have decoding, recall, writing, and spelling problems that could represent barriers accessing content.…”