2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online estimation of the wavefront outer scale profile from adaptive optics telemetry

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another thing to note in (14) is that we still represent the PSD as a sum of radial basis functions, which does introduce some small amount of modeling error. This is done purely for computational reasons, since calculating the term corresponding to Bφ(c, γ) exactly would require an expensive Fourier transform, which would take the runtime of fmincon from seconds to hours on a desktop computer.…”
Section: Methods 1: Parametric Power Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another thing to note in (14) is that we still represent the PSD as a sum of radial basis functions, which does introduce some small amount of modeling error. This is done purely for computational reasons, since calculating the term corresponding to Bφ(c, γ) exactly would require an expensive Fourier transform, which would take the runtime of fmincon from seconds to hours on a desktop computer.…”
Section: Methods 1: Parametric Power Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach deduces the profile from the cross-correlations by deconvolution with the autocorrelation of the data [37,36]. The second approach [14,12,9,15,6,35] forms a linear dependency between the spatial cross-correlations and the vertical turbulence profile by assuming that the turbulence statistics at any altitude is accurately described by the Kolmogorov or von Kármán model [27,21,22]. This paper grows out of a number of experiments which confirm significant deviations of the turbulence statistics from the classical models in certain portions of the atmosphere [28,38,29,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present in this section the most recent advances made for the characterization step, which are related to the upgrade by Guesalaga et al 17 of the SLODAR-type (SLOpe Detection And Ranging) turbulence profiler in order to estimate non-uniform profiles of the outer scale of the turbulence, L 0 (h). This SLODAR profiler was originally developed for GeMS (Gemini South Multiconjugate AO system) 18 and the upgraded version is now currently tested on the Adaptive Optics Facility (AOF) at the Very Large Telescope (VLT).…”
Section: Advances In Step 1: Profiling the Outer Scale Of Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dedicated instruments exist to monitor this profile [17,3,24], but they aim at characterising the observation site in terms of atmosphere quality and do not observe in the telescope line of sight. Consequently, their estimated profile deviate up to at least 10 % [16], from AO telemetry-based approaches available for multi-GS AO systems [10,9,11,12,15]. However, according to [1], 10% of error on the C 2 n (h) estimation may degrade the photometry and astrometry determination up to respectively 3% and 300 µas in a 20"-FOV, while we are seeking to reach better than 1% and 150 µas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%