2015
DOI: 10.1177/1609406915621383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Facebook Focus Group Research of Hard-to-Reach Participants

Abstract: Conducting discovery-oriented qualitative research about the life experiences of hard-to-reach individuals posed several challenges for recruiting participants and collecting rich textual data. In a study pertaining the experiences of Third Culture Kids (TCKs), we explored the benefits of the social media, such as Facebook as a platform to collect data. TCKs are individuals who define their sense of belonging to the third culture trailing their parents moving across borders during their developmental years. Ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 14% of participants in the present study, however, said they would share photos of themselves participating in intervention activities. The reluctance of participants in the present study to share photos of themselves may be related to concerns regarding privacy, as was a concern for 30% of participants in this survey and has been identified across the literature as a prime limitation of social media interventions . To somewhat overcome this limitation, the idea of an intervention ‘champion’ was proposed to participants, as a trained and supported participant, that takes the lead in intervention engagement and participation to maximise the potential for observational learning and peer reinforcement .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 14% of participants in the present study, however, said they would share photos of themselves participating in intervention activities. The reluctance of participants in the present study to share photos of themselves may be related to concerns regarding privacy, as was a concern for 30% of participants in this survey and has been identified across the literature as a prime limitation of social media interventions . To somewhat overcome this limitation, the idea of an intervention ‘champion’ was proposed to participants, as a trained and supported participant, that takes the lead in intervention engagement and participation to maximise the potential for observational learning and peer reinforcement .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further strength of this method was that, although potentially novel in its use, it remained evidence-based in the asynchronous remote community (ARC) literature. Previous research has suggested optimal methods of recruitment (online networks); content (a friendly and informal atmosphere, posting often, similar prompts to in-person focus groups); sample size (between 13 and 48 participants); facilitator role (to respond quickly to questions, post prompts at similar times daily) and analysis method (content analysis), which this study followed closely (5,10,12,13,25). Additionally, given that this method allowed for participants to take as much time as needed to consider and respond to a prompt -in contrast to the immediacy of in-person interviews and focus groups -another strength could be increased thoughtfulness of answers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyone can see the existence of a closed Facebook group. However, a secret group is not viewable by anyone except those in the group -who are able to join only by direct invitation (10). It is private and hidden in searches; those who are not members of a secret Facebook group cannot see the existence or the content of the secret Facebook group (11).…”
Section: The Internet As a Tool For Co-productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Group interviews conducted online were synchronous and were conducted using the chat tool available on Facebook. Due to the popularity, affordability, and ease of access of this particular online social platform, researchers are increasingly utilizing this approach to conduct studies in a variety of different areas of study (e.g., [71][72][73][74][75]). However, given the different nature of the focus groups conducted (i.e., offline and online), a few considerations were taken into account before implementing them.…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%