2010 IEEE 16th International on-Line Testing Symposium 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iolts.2010.5560205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online fault testing of reversible logic using dual rail coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantum cost overhead for our approach is only 4.21% in average, compared to 312.28% for the approach in [22], [23], 388.67% for the approach in [26], and 41.40% for the approach in [24], [25]. It is interesting to note that our approach has absolutely no overhead in terms of garbage outputs since the testability feature does not produce any extra garbage.…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The quantum cost overhead for our approach is only 4.21% in average, compared to 312.28% for the approach in [22], [23], 388.67% for the approach in [26], and 41.40% for the approach in [24], [25]. It is interesting to note that our approach has absolutely no overhead in terms of garbage outputs since the testability feature does not produce any extra garbage.…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Table II summarizes the improvements achieved by our approach. Quantum costs are decreased by 74.72%, 78.68%, and 26.30% in average, compared to ( [22], [23]), [26], and ( [24], [25]), respectively. Reductions of garbage outputs range from 96.89% to 99.84% in average, compared to the previous approaches.…”
Section: Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations