2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.0171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online fractional open‐circuit voltage maximum output power algorithm for photovoltaic modules

Abstract: An efficient maximum power point tracking technique is developed, which realises the fractional open-circuit voltage (FOCV) algorithm through a unique on-line procedure. The proposed method continuously estimates the open-circuit voltage by measuring instantaneous voltage, current, and temperature of the photovoltaic module without disconnecting the power flow to the load. Simultaneously, the open-circuit voltage (V oc) value can be measured at any operating point of the I-V curve and does not require any pert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is expected that the traditional P&O will not be capable of extracting the global maximum all the time. In this regard, the studied methods can successfully track the highest peak if this peak is the last one [14]. This case is clarified in Fig.…”
Section: Performance Of the Proposed Mppt Under Partial Shading Condi...mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is expected that the traditional P&O will not be capable of extracting the global maximum all the time. In this regard, the studied methods can successfully track the highest peak if this peak is the last one [14]. This case is clarified in Fig.…”
Section: Performance Of the Proposed Mppt Under Partial Shading Condi...mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Modelbased MPPT algorithms are also discussed in the literature, such as the fractional open-circuit voltage method, and fractional short-circuit current [13]. In this regard, online estimation for the open-circuit voltage or the short-circuit current can be implemented to decrease the power loss in the conventional methods [14]. Furthermore, hybrid techniques, where a combination of two methods can be utilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, an MPP tracker is necessary to ensure that the MPP remains operational regardless of the weather conditions. In the previous two decades, a significant amount of the literature has been documenting the various types of MPPT algorithms utilized in optimizing the energy of PV arrays, including traditional techniques such as perturb and observe [5], hill-climbing [6] and incremental conductance [7], fractional open-circuit voltage [8], and fractional short-circuit current [9]. However, due to partial shading, these may just be stuck in one of the local maxima and fail to track the MPP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques have serious problems that reduce their tracking performance. For that reason, many improved versions of algorithms based on the aforementioned traditional direct methods are suggested [11][12][13][14][15][16] including indirect MPPT schemes, such as fractional open-circuit voltage (FOCV) [17] and short-circuit current (FSCC) [18]; intelligent techniques MPPT schemes include fuzzy logic controller (FLC) [19,20], partial swarm optimization (PSO) [21,22], firefly algorithm (FA) [23], ant colony optimization (ACO) [24], neural network algorithm (NNA) [24], hybrid adaptive neurofuzzy inference system flower pollination algorithm (ANFIS-FPA) [25], and hybrid adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm [26]. These MPPT schemes differ in some factors, such as fluctuations in steady-state operation, convergence speed, especially under fast irradiation or temperature change, complexity, required sensors, time response, and tracking of the real MPP at partial shading effect [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%