2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online hierarchical and distributed method for voltage control in distribution smart grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For LV levels, in practice, most utilities with a European-style network design use only the secondary distribution transformers equipped with off-load tap changers to control voltages. Once again, the use of both the traditional and novel MV volt/var control solutions mentioned above has been intensively proposed in the most current literature, but it is not applied in practice [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. The use of OLTC transformers in secondary distribution substations is currently the closest to realizing an LV reality [19,[32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For LV levels, in practice, most utilities with a European-style network design use only the secondary distribution transformers equipped with off-load tap changers to control voltages. Once again, the use of both the traditional and novel MV volt/var control solutions mentioned above has been intensively proposed in the most current literature, but it is not applied in practice [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. The use of OLTC transformers in secondary distribution substations is currently the closest to realizing an LV reality [19,[32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the technology, two different methods of operating an OLTCST are possible: (1) a synchronized tap change among the three phases or (2) decoupled control [32]. Most previous works have dealt with uniform and common tap positions for all three phases of the MV/LV-controlled transformer (3P-OLTCST) [19][20][21]28,30,31,[33][34][35], but increasingly, more tap position settings among transformer phases are being proposed (1P-OLTCST) [24,25,29,32,36]. Decoupled control is obviously a great deal more attractive for LV networks because of their unbalanced nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yilmaz and El‐Shatshat presented voltage/VAR control with OLTC and wind‐based renewable distributed generations to minimize power losses and voltage deviation. Voltage control in distribution systems with coordination between DG and OLTC was presented in Fallahzadeh‐Abarghouei et al using distributed gradient algorithm. In Kulmala et al Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA)‐based scheme was developed for optimal voltage regulation with DG and OLTC using rule‐based technique and optimization algorithm to determine DG outputs and tap positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various optimization techniques were reported in previous studies [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] and sensitivity-based techniques 41,42,47,48 were proposed by many authors to determine optimal location and rating of D-STATCOM in distribution systems to minimize power losses and improve voltage profile. Few researchers have studied D-STATCOM placement problem along with DG in previous studies 42,43,46,49 and reconfiguration of radial distribution systems in Fallahzadeh-Abarghouei et al 29 and Bai et al 37 Differential evolution (DE) algorithms were used in other studies 39,40,44 for optimal placement of D-STATCOM in distribution systems. The authors addressed impact of reconfiguration on D-STATCOM placement problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%