2014
DOI: 10.1108/intr-09-2013-0193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online HIV prevention information

Abstract: Purpose -Two research questions are addressed: what are black female college students' perceptions of current messages present on web sites about HIV/AIDS awareness and prevention?; and what messages do black female college students find culturally relevant to them, and why? Results indicate that these women perceive several communication barriers including lack of trust and unfamiliarity with information sources, stigma ascribed to HIV, as well as misconceptions and traditional values held by some in the blac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous research, and complimentary to the amount of social media usage by Black youth, the suggested mode of delivery for HIV prevention content was Social Media outlets (Chandler et al, 2015; Payton et al, 2014, Pew Research Center, 2014). Participants recommended creating short audio-visual messages with an emphasis on scenarios that market relatable or familiar contexts/settings (e.g., dorm room), appealing graphics for HIV health promotion messages (e.g., emojis), and realistic visual representation of overall HIV health and wellness (e.g., people living with HIV look like me).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with previous research, and complimentary to the amount of social media usage by Black youth, the suggested mode of delivery for HIV prevention content was Social Media outlets (Chandler et al, 2015; Payton et al, 2014, Pew Research Center, 2014). Participants recommended creating short audio-visual messages with an emphasis on scenarios that market relatable or familiar contexts/settings (e.g., dorm room), appealing graphics for HIV health promotion messages (e.g., emojis), and realistic visual representation of overall HIV health and wellness (e.g., people living with HIV look like me).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Similar to results noted by Payton, Kvasny, and Kiwanuka-Tondo (2014), the Black college women wanted information to be candid and precise, and felt that freshmen could benefit from these efforts the most. To heighten HIV Knowledge , Participants recommended a ‘freshman loading dose of HIV information’ that would include not only exposure to all the HIV prevention media, but a freshman orientation on sex and sexuality that would coincide with the general orientation offered by the university.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Banas, 2008;Borzekowski & Rickert, 2001;Douglas et al, 2004;Ghaddar et al, 2012;Hong, 2006;Ivanitskaya et al, 2006;Jiménez-Pernett et al, 2010;Johnson et al, 2015;;S. H. Lim & Kim, 2012;McKinley & Ruppel, 2014;Mou & Cohen, 2014;Neal et al, 2011;Nustad et al, 2008;Oh & Kim, 2014;Payton et al, 2014;Percheski & Hargittai, 2011;Rowley et al, 2015;Scott et al, 2008;Selkie et al, 2011;Senkowski & Branscum, 2015;Skinner et al, 2003;Smart et al, 2012;Tsan & Day, 2007;Van Velsen et al, 2012 Credibility and reliability of information (content or message), information sources, information providers or websites. Bansal & Gefen, 2010;Batten & Dutton, 2011;Catellier & Yang, 2012;Cho et al, 2015;Dutta-Bergman, 2004;Eastin, 2001;Escoffery et al, 2005;Freeman & Spyridakis, 2004;Gray et al, 2005;Hansen et al, 2003;Henderson et al, 2009;Horgan & Sweeney, 2010;Hu & Sundar, 2010;…”
Section: Table 1 Researchers' Notions Of Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many students reported crossreferencing as a method of assessing credibility online and stated "[i]f a content could be found in more than one website, it was more likely true" (Pariera, 2012). In the study of Payton et al (2014), some students preferred to use Google or wikis, but finally they used to check credibility of the retrieved information from other well-renowned health information sources such as the National Institutes of Health. found that students' trust in retrieved online information was based on 'cross-check' or 'verification' of the information in other sources like 'friends' and 'family', or on comparison with 'prior knowledge'.…”
Section: Students' Source Preferences and Information Seeking Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%