2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for Top-Down Proteomics

Abstract: Recent progress in top-down proteomics has led to a demand for mass spectrometry (MS)-compatible chromatography techniques to separate intact proteins using volatile mobile phases. Conventional hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) provides high-resolution separation of proteins under non-denaturing conditions but requires high concentrations of nonvolatile salts. Herein, we introduce a series of more hydrophobic HIC materials that can retain proteins using MS-compatible concentrations of ammonium aceta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
114
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
114
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In HIC, a gradient with a decreasing concentration of salt is used to separate proteins based on hydrophobic interactions. Commonly used salts for achieving high-resolution separation of proteins by HIC contains sulfate, phosphate, and citrate, which are incompatible with MS [45]. Ammonium acetate is an MS-compatible salt, but HIC separation using ammonium acetate suffers from low separation power due to inadequate protein retention when used with conventional HIC materials [45].…”
Section: Top-down Proteomics Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In HIC, a gradient with a decreasing concentration of salt is used to separate proteins based on hydrophobic interactions. Commonly used salts for achieving high-resolution separation of proteins by HIC contains sulfate, phosphate, and citrate, which are incompatible with MS [45]. Ammonium acetate is an MS-compatible salt, but HIC separation using ammonium acetate suffers from low separation power due to inadequate protein retention when used with conventional HIC materials [45].…”
Section: Top-down Proteomics Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…recently evaluated a series of HIC columns with heightened degrees of hydrophobicity to compensate for the inadequate retention of proteins by the stationary phase when using ammonium acetate in the mobile phase. They demonstrated improved protein retention using columns with stationary phases that were more hydrophobic than conventional HIC stationary phases and a mobile phase containing ammonium acetate, which opens the door for the use of this powerful high-resolution separation method for top-down proteomics analysis [45]. Importantly, HIC and RPC are orthogonal with different selectivity for intact protein separation [46], despite the fact that both methods separate proteins based on hydrophobicity.…”
Section: Top-down Proteomics Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most commonly used are moderately hydrophobic ligands such as n -alkanes (butyl, octyl, phenyl) [82, 88]. However, newly developed materials have emerged which use cholesterol [89], dendronic ligands [90] and dual functional stationary phases [91].…”
Section: Implementation Of Different Selectivities In Intact Protein mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online HIC− MS as well as HIC−RPC−MS have been successfully employed for top-down proteomics analyses of single proteins and complex protein mixtures. 19,20 We considered HIC to be a promising alternative to already established fractionation techniques for studying single proteins and protein complexes by bottom-up MS-based proteomics. The developed workflow is suitable for characterization of native soluble protein complexes as well as peptide mapping of single purified proteins and biologics.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%