2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6420/aac220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online learning in optical tomography: a stochastic approach

Abstract: We study the inverse problem of radiative transfer equation (RTE) using stochastic gradient descent method (SGD) in this paper. Mathematically, optical tomography amounts to recovering the optical parameters in RTE using the incoming-outgoing pair of light intensity. We formulate it as a PDE-constraint optimization problem, where the mismatch of computed and measured outgoing data is minimized with same initial data and RTE constraint. The memory and computation cost it requires, however, is typically prohibit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because most PDE-based inverse problems eventually are formulated as minimization problem with the loss function being in the format of a summation of multiple smaller loss functions. This is the exactly the format where SGD outperforms other optimization methods [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This is because most PDE-based inverse problems eventually are formulated as minimization problem with the loss function being in the format of a summation of multiple smaller loss functions. This is the exactly the format where SGD outperforms other optimization methods [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…, n}, and η k > 0 is the corresponding step size. This algorithm has demonstrated very encouraging numerical results in [2] for diffuse optical tomography (with radiative transfer equation). It is also worth noting that a variant of the algorithm, i.e., randomized Kaczmarz method (RKM) (see, e.g., [20,11] for the equivalence result between RKM and Algorithm 1), has been extremely successful in the computed tomography community [7,8] (see, e.g., [24] and [26] for interesting linear convergence results of the RKM for least-squares regression and phase retrieval with "well-conditioned" matrix and exact data).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Remark 4.4. The constants in Lemma 4.5 involve an unpleasant dependence on the number of equations n as n 1 2 . This is due to the variance inflation of the stochastic gradient estimate instead of the true gradient.…”
Section: Stochastic Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this situation, the forward model is the classical elliptic type equation, and mathematically, recovering the optical parameter amounts to reconstructing the diffusion coefficient in the elliptic equation using the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map [39], and is proven mathematically to be logarithmically unstable [1]. Multiple strategies are adopted to "stabilize" the problem [33,37], both by adjusting the experimental modalities upfront, or introducing image deblurring techniques as a post-processing [16,27,36,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%