2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online melt pool depth estimation during directed energy deposition using coaxial infrared camera, laser line scanner, and artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deposition occurs by means of the melt pool and is related with all those fundamental parameters governing the L-DED process [13], so it is reasonable to expect that its state represents a great portion of the quality of the built part. Monitoring performed in real time using machine learning (ML) algorithms and neural networks (NN) present a model-free monitoring approach, which is suitable for complex systems that require a multiphysical modelling involving a great number of variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deposition occurs by means of the melt pool and is related with all those fundamental parameters governing the L-DED process [13], so it is reasonable to expect that its state represents a great portion of the quality of the built part. Monitoring performed in real time using machine learning (ML) algorithms and neural networks (NN) present a model-free monitoring approach, which is suitable for complex systems that require a multiphysical modelling involving a great number of variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been some research inclined towards an establishment of melt pool monitoring through imaging [17,18] with the aid of artificial intelligence methods [7,15]. They can also be linked to the rapid growth and improvement of image processing techniques, especially those using modern ML techniques, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various monitoring techniques have been employed to capture process parameters, e.g. laser power, powder feed rate and feed speed and position [14], and indirect information on the process, such as temperature [15,16], melt pool behavior and characteristics [17][18][19], etc. Infrared cameras and pyrometers are commonly used to measure the temperature distribution and monitor the melt pool dynamics; and high-speed cameras capture the deposition process in real-time, allowing for visual inspection of the bead formation and detection of defects such as lack of fusion or porosity [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These signals are taken in situ and follow the melt pool as it scans across the build surface. [17][18][19][20] This method of monitoring aims to match features of the melt pool images to process dynamics. Seifi et al 21 used these melt pool images to detect anomalies layer-wise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%