2022
DOI: 10.12669/pjms.38.8.5804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online mentoring: Challenges and strategies

Abstract: Objectives: To gain insights into the e-mentoring experience, needs of the stakeholders (mentors and mentees) challenges and strategies to overcome the challenges. Methods: Qualitative exploratory study was conducted in Islamic International Medical College, from February 2021 to July 2021. The study duration was six months. Six ‘Semi-structured interviews’ of mentors and two ‘focus group discussions’ with mentees were conducted. A purposeful sampling technique was employed to select the respondents. Dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 22 , 23 It was also recommended to make use of online mentoring and provide flexibility to all those who wish to get mentored irrespective of gender, ethnicity, disability and geographical location. 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 22 , 23 It was also recommended to make use of online mentoring and provide flexibility to all those who wish to get mentored irrespective of gender, ethnicity, disability and geographical location. 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 It was also recommended to make use of online mentoring and provide flexibility to all those who wish to get mentored irrespective of gender, ethnicity, disability and geographical location. 24 Strengths of the study: This is the first ever study conducted in Pakistan to evaluate the mentorship program in the health care system. The study achieved a high level of success in gathering comprehensive information from diverse hierarchical positions, enabling a range of perspectives and recommendations for improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%