2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8ew00271a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online monitoring of N-nitrosodimethylamine for the removal assurance of 1,4-dioxane and other trace organic compounds by reverse osmosis

Abstract: Online monitoring of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) during reverse osmosis (RO) treatment was effective in ensuring the removal of trace organic chemicals, particularly 1,4-dioxane.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An equilibrium time of 12 h was allowed before feed and permeate samples were collected for further analysis using an ultraperformance liquid chromatograph with double mass spectra (UPLC-MS/MS, Waters ACQUITY) . According to the literature, the equilibrium time ensures stable rejection performance (e.g., by eliminating the potential effect of TrOC sorption by the membrane). The rejection of each TrOC was determined based on the measured feed ( C f ) and permeate ( C p ) concentrations (eq ) using three different membrane samples.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An equilibrium time of 12 h was allowed before feed and permeate samples were collected for further analysis using an ultraperformance liquid chromatograph with double mass spectra (UPLC-MS/MS, Waters ACQUITY) . According to the literature, the equilibrium time ensures stable rejection performance (e.g., by eliminating the potential effect of TrOC sorption by the membrane). The rejection of each TrOC was determined based on the measured feed ( C f ) and permeate ( C p ) concentrations (eq ) using three different membrane samples.…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…197 No interference is observed in the direct injection of reverse osmosis permeate, which has allowed this method to be used for online near real-time monitoring of NDMA in wastewater treated by reverse osmosis at pilot scale. 198 The method has been validated for the detection of four nitrosamines in several recycled water matrices 199 and performs comparably to SPE-GC−MS/MS methods. 197 However, although the sensitivity is impressive when detecting NDMA, NMEA, N-nitrosomorpholine (NMOR), and N-nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR), the method's performance detecting NDEA and NPIP is disappointing (LODs > 15 ng/L).…”
Section: ■ Detection and Sensing Of N-nitrosaminesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interference from hypochlorite, commonly found in reclaimed wastewater, could be eliminated by brief pretreatment of the sample with ascorbic acid, and interference from residuals in ultrafiltration-treated wastewater could be controlled by reducing the injection volume to 20 μL while still achieving a method detection limit of 2 ng/L for NDMA . No interference is observed in the direct injection of reverse osmosis permeate, which has allowed this method to be used for online near real-time monitoring of NDMA in wastewater treated by reverse osmosis at pilot scale . The method has been validated for the detection of four nitrosamines in several recycled water matrices and performs comparably to SPE-GC–MS/MS methods .…”
Section: Detection and Sensing Of N-nitrosaminesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N ‐Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) has been identified as a probable human carcinogen through the methylation of DNA (Schäfer et al, 2010). NDMA can form as a disinfection byproduct and is often present in water above the detection limit but below 10 ng/L (Fujioka, Kodamatani, Takeuchi, Tanaka, & Nghiem, 2018). However, the highest concentrations of NDMA are produced during chloramination and ozonation (up to 280 ng/L) (Kosaka, Asami, Konno, Oya, & Kunikane, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steric hindrance and hydrophobic interactions between solutes and NF/RO membrane polymers strongly influence the rejection of uncharged organic solutes (Bhattacharjee, Sharma, & Bhattacharya, 1996; Breitner et al, 2019; Ghoufi, Dražević, & Szymczyk, 2017; Wang, Mo, Mahendra, & Hoek, 2014). Most studies report higher rejection of negatively charged organic solutes due to electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged membranes and organic solutes (Fujioka et al, 2018). Rejection of surrogate indicators, such as boron (Breitner, Howe, & Minakata, 2018) and NDMA by RO membranes, was successfully used to predict the rejection of trace organic solutes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%