2021 European Control Conference (ECC) 2021
DOI: 10.23919/ecc54610.2021.9654872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Motion Planning based on Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Non-Euclidean Rotation Groups

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To better test the performance of our proposed method for static obstacle avoidance, we compare the proposed method with DWA (Fox et al , 1997), MPC (Rosmann et al , 2021) and the local model predictive contouring control (LMPCC) (Brito et al , 2019) algorithms in the same scene. As shown in Figure 8, we place three obstacles in the corridor and a waypoint at the corner.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To better test the performance of our proposed method for static obstacle avoidance, we compare the proposed method with DWA (Fox et al , 1997), MPC (Rosmann et al , 2021) and the local model predictive contouring control (LMPCC) (Brito et al , 2019) algorithms in the same scene. As shown in Figure 8, we place three obstacles in the corridor and a waypoint at the corner.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robot can also complete path planning and obstacle avoidance well through experimental tests in large scenarios or by increasing the distance between obstacles, as shown in Figure 7. To better test the performance of our proposed method for static obstacle avoidance, we compare the proposed method with DWA (Fox et al, 1997), MPC (Rosmann et al, 2021) and the local model predictive contouring control (LMPCC) (Brito et al, 2019) algorithms in the same scene. As shown in Figure 8, we place three obstacles in the corridor and a waypoint at the corner.…”
Section: Static Collision Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the previous research paper, [15] represents a novel online motion planning approach based on nonlinear MPC. Using non-euclidean rotation groups, the authors have formulated an optimization problem that solves local planning via optimal control.…”
Section: B Model Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its ability to tackle optimization problems on a finite time-horizon, MPC has been chosen as a method for trajectory generation. The approach was inspired by [15], q_nearest q_dead_end Fig. 4: If a parent-node is unable to spawn child-nodes (left), that parent is marked as a dead-end node (right).…”
Section: B Local Plannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address these limitations, this paper proposes a distributed motion planning method that combines the kinematic constraints of robots, static environment constraints, and the predicted behaviors of neighboring robots to achieve collaborative motion planning for multiple robots while ensuring real-time performance. The distributed method is based on Model Predictive Contouring Control (MPCC), which is proposed for real-time motion planning of a single mobile robot [19,20] . The MPCC allows separating the tracking accuracy and productivity to reach a good trade-off between these two objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%