2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online multi-frame blind deconvolution with super-resolution and saturation correction

Abstract: Astronomical images taken by ground-based telescopes suffer degradation due to atmospheric turbulence. This degradation can be tackled by costly hardware-based approaches such as adaptive optics, or by sophisticated software-based methods such as lucky imaging, speckle imaging, or multi-frame deconvolution. Software-based methods process a sequence of images to reconstruct a deblurred high-quality image. However, existing approaches are limited in one or several aspects: (i) they process all images in batch mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the observed images are mainly corrupted by Poisson distributed quantum noise and additive Gaussian noise. The Poisson noise is signal-dependent [1], whereas the Gaussian noise is signal-independent [4]. Although Schulz et al proposed to include a mixed noise model earlier [6], their approach is limited because 1) it only works when the parameters of the image system are fully known and 2) actually, their probability model was derived from Poisson noise, different to our approach.…”
Section: Mixed Noise Model Based Mfbdmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the observed images are mainly corrupted by Poisson distributed quantum noise and additive Gaussian noise. The Poisson noise is signal-dependent [1], whereas the Gaussian noise is signal-independent [4]. Although Schulz et al proposed to include a mixed noise model earlier [6], their approach is limited because 1) it only works when the parameters of the image system are fully known and 2) actually, their probability model was derived from Poisson noise, different to our approach.…”
Section: Mixed Noise Model Based Mfbdmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Many MFBD algorithms and theoretical results have been developed; they used different a priori information in image restoration. Conventional MFBD algorithms usually assume that the observed images are corrupted by a single type of noise, either Poisson noise [1][2][3] or Gaussian noise [4,5]. Instead of adopting these strategies, we propose a novel multi-frame image restoration algorithm by adopting a mixed noise model (MFRAM); MFRAM can achieve a faster convergence, reduce noise more effectively and preserve more image details.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (14) presents multiple paths for the estimation of the object phase at each spatial frequency. To have a reasonable signal to noise ratio (SNR) averaging over five different subplane choices (represented by the value of Df) is sufficient to provide a good balance between execution time and reconstructed image quality for daytime horizontal imaging [10].…”
Section: Bispectrum Speckle Imaging Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques include least squares minimization [15], simulated annealing [19], genetic algorithm [24], and artificial neural networks [28,29]. In the context of real-time processing, the work in [14] presents an efficient online technique that processes the input sequence one frame at a time. Each new frame is used to gradually improve the image reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, DIAs utilizing numerical kernels, such as DanDIA (Bramich 2008), seem well-suited because a lucky imaging PSF in general seems to be peculiar and variable with a near diffraction limited core and an extended halo, comparable to the conventional seeing limit (Baldwin et al 2008). In the vein of not wasting photons and cleverly including the high resolution information, another interesting technique is online deconvolution (Hirsch et al 2011). These approaches will be pursued in future work.…”
Section: Strategies For Photometry In Crowded Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%