Online or face-to-face instruction? A qualitative study on the electrocardiogram course at the University of Ulm to examine why students choose a particular format

Abstract

BackgroundSince the introduction of the e-learning electrocardiogram (ECG) course ‘ECG Online’ into the curriculum at the University of Ulm, a small but relatively constant number of students have decided not to participate in the online course but to attend the face-to-face course, although the content of both courses is identical. The present study examined why students prefer one format or the other.MethodsIn a qualitative research approach, ten medical students were questioned in a guided interview. At the time of the survey the interviewees were enrolled in the 7th to 10th semesters. Among the respondents, 2 had participated only in the face-to-face ECG course, 4 only in the online version and 4 in both the face-to-face and the online course.ResultsInterestingly, the very factors associated with e-learning – and always praised as advantages of it – are viewed critically by the students. Thus, although the 24-h access to learning content was consistently evaluated positively, the unlimited availability (lack of expiry date) was not seen as conducive to learning. The lack of fixed time constraints and the attendant lack of pressure were important reasons why some of the students had discontinued the online course prematurely. A similar distinction was seen in the flexibility of location for e-learning, because the very obligation to be physically present on a particular day at a fixed time led to a higher degree of commitment to courses and a willingness to actually attend the course until the end. In addition, if the content has a high degree of perceived professional relevance face-to-face courses are preferred because they offer the possibility of direct interaction.ConclusionsEven though the small sample size limits the generalisability of the results, our findings indicate that when developing online courses students’ needs could be better met if measures were included to strengthen extrinsic and intrinsic motivation and formats were favoured that enable students to have a minimum level of personal interaction with the lecturer.

Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students

“…For example, the limited synchronous aspects of pre-recorded content may deter students due to the lack of opportunities to interact with lecturers. 57 Also, watching pre-recorded lectures, alongside the possibility of attending face-to-face lecture, has been shown to negatively correlate with learning success. 58 …”

COVID-19 y virtualización de la docencia universitaria: caso práctico de la asignatura de gestión farmacéutica avanzada

“…No obstante, y comparando ambas modalidades de enseñanza (virtual y presencial), aproximadamente el 97% de los alumnos indicaron una pérdida de aprendizaje en la enseñanza magistral online de los supuestos prácticos, siendo percibida como alta o muy alta por el 33% de los estudiantes, sugiriendo una preferencia por la enseñanza presencial de los seminarios. De hecho, otros autores han indicado resultados similares en disciplinas médicas, indicando que los alumnos prefieren en muchos casos el modelo de enseñanza tradicional "cara a cara", al favorecer la interacción alumno-profesor para resolver pequeñas dudas que les surgen "in situ", especialmente en aquellas disciplinas con un fuerte componente práctico [15].…”

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on students’ performance in a problem-based learning system: comparative study between face-to-face-and virtual learning.

“…Most published data comparing traditional to e-learning methods in medical education has focused primarily on students' acceptance, motivation and satisfaction [13,19,20]. However, few reported on the effect of e-learning on the medical students' performance in nal exams.…”