2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2018.8594099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Path Planning and Compliance Control of Space Robot for Capturing Tumbling Large Object

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given an initial and final positions, xi and xf, respectively of the manipulator, and a set of desired constraints, find a continuous path such that the path starts from xi at initial time t0 and reaches xf at a given time tf while satisfying all constrains at all time during the operation. The considered constrains are: (1) obstacle avoidance (static or dynamic relative to the service robot), (2) collision avoidance, (3) singularity avoidance (kinematic and dynamic), and (4) dynamic coupling effect minimization or (5) attitude control [3,5,7]. Fast and on-line solution of this problem is also a vital feature for the space robots, and for this analysis.…”
Section: Considered Path Planning Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given an initial and final positions, xi and xf, respectively of the manipulator, and a set of desired constraints, find a continuous path such that the path starts from xi at initial time t0 and reaches xf at a given time tf while satisfying all constrains at all time during the operation. The considered constrains are: (1) obstacle avoidance (static or dynamic relative to the service robot), (2) collision avoidance, (3) singularity avoidance (kinematic and dynamic), and (4) dynamic coupling effect minimization or (5) attitude control [3,5,7]. Fast and on-line solution of this problem is also a vital feature for the space robots, and for this analysis.…”
Section: Considered Path Planning Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, relevant features stand out, for example: collaborative use of the base and manipulator for planning [3,5], effective handling of multiple constraints via dynamic adjusting of optimization penalty factors [5], as well as by constraint prioritization depending on the task [6]. On-line path planning was allowed by reducing the number of constraints and thus computation power [7], and by training machine learning models (ML) to derive optimal path planning policies off-line [8]. ML was also used to provide an initial guess for the optimization procedure [9], contrasting to the methods which do not require a priori knowledge [3].…”
Section: B Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A coordinated control method for a single manipulator capturing of a tumbling target, implementing a fast, on-line updating manipulator path planner and end-effector compliance control, was proposed ( Gangapersaud et al, 2019 ). Coordinated detumbling of a non-cooperative captured target, with simultaneous servicing vehicle attitude PD control, was developed in Hirano et al (2018) . However, both abovementioned methods do not consider singularity avoidance or manipulator workspace constraints.…”
Section: Feedback Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploiting the non-holonomic behavior of the orbital manipulator system for spacecraft attitude and end-effector trajectory control have been studied extensively. It usually involves joint space techniques to control both the motion of the arm and sometimes the spacecraft attitude Yoshida and Nakanishi, 2003;Hirano et al, 2018. Early research used mapping methods to correlate the end-effector position with the induced disturbances on the spacecraft to minimize the attitude disturbances Torres and Dubowsky, 1992;Vafa and Dubowsky, 1993. However, the mapping methods are computationally inefficient and furthermore, higher DoF manipulators will significantly increase the mapping difficulty and are challenging to find optimised paths.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%