Online Patient Education Materials Related to Lipoprotein(a): Readability Assessment

Abstract

Background Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a highly proatherogenic lipid fraction that is a clinically significant risk modifier. Patients wanting to learn more about Lp(a) are likely to use online patient educational materials (OPEMs). However, the readability of OPEMs may exceed the health literacy of the public. Objective This study aims to assess the readability of OPEMs related to Lp(a). We hypothesized that the readability of these online materials would exceed the sixth grade level recommended by the American Medical Association. Methods Using an online search engine, we queried the top 20 search results from 10 commonly used Lp(a)-related search terms to identify a total of 200 websites. We excluded duplicate websites, advertised results, research journal articles, or non–patient-directed materials, such as those intended only for health professionals or researchers. Grade level readability was calculated using 5 standard readability metrics (automated readability index, SMOG index, Coleman-Liau index, Gunning Fog score, Flesch-Kincaid score) to produce robust point (mean) and interval (CI) estimates of readability. Generalized estimating equations were used to model grade level readability by each search term, with the 5 readability scores nested within each OPEM. Results A total of 27 unique websites were identified for analysis. The average readability score for the aggregated results was a 12.2 (95% CI 10.9798-13.3978) grade level. OPEMs were grouped into 6 categories by primary source: industry, lay press, research foundation and nonprofit organizations, university or government, clinic, and other. The most readable category was OPEMs published by universities or government agencies (9.0, 95% CI 6.8-11.3). The least readable OPEMs on average were the ones published by the lay press (13.0, 95% CI 11.2-14.8). All categories exceeded the sixth grade reading level recommended by the American Medical Association. Conclusions Lack of access to readable OPEMs may disproportionately affect patients with low health literacy. Ensuring that online content is understandable by broad audiences is a necessary component of increasing the impact of novel therapeutics and recommendations regarding Lp(a).

Health literacy characteristics of over-the-counter rapid antigen COVID-19 test materials

“…Studies conducted over the past two decades clearly document health literacy-related deficits (e.g., exceedingly high reading demands, suboptimal layout design features) of a broad range of consumer health information. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 To date, a handful of studies have critically assessed content and health literacy-related features of consumer COVID-19 information. In their assessment of COVID-19 consumer educational materials generated from Google, Yahoo!, and Bing internet searches (search terms included: coronavirus, COVID-19, COVID19, and COVID 19), Caballero et al found most to be difficult to read and lacked recommended features such inclusion of visual images and clearly defined manageable instructions.…”

Lipoprotein(a): An important piece of the ASCVD risk factor puzzle across diverse populations

“…As clinicians, we can engage in shared decision-making with our patients and utilize patient-focused educational materials to improve patients' knowledge of the risks associated with elevated Lp(a) and the importance of Lp(a) testing [ 54 ]. Patients can be directed to societies or advocacy groups, such as the Family Heart Foundation ( https://familyheart.org/ ), which offers frequent patient- and clinician-facing webinars on Lp(a), for more information, particularly with respect to family screening [ 55 ].…”

Evaluation of Prompts to Simplify Cardiovascular Disease Information Generated Using a Large Language Model: Cross-Sectional Study

“…Many web-based patient educational materials about cardiovascular disease (CVD) are inaccessible for the general public [ 1 ]. Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots powered by large language models (LLMs) are a potential source of public-facing CVD information [ 2 - 4 ].…”