2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1902.09745
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Predictive Optimization Framework for Stochastic Demand-Responsive Transit Services

Inon Peled,
Kelvin Lee,
Yu Jiang
et al.

Abstract: This study develops an online predictive optimization framework for dynamically operating a transit service in an area of crowd movements. The proposed framework integrates demand prediction and supply optimization to periodically redesign the service routes based on recently observed demand. To predict demand for the service, we use Quantile Regression to estimate the marginal distribution of movement counts between each pair of serviced locations. The framework then combines these marginals into a joint dema… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For future work, we plan to extend the current study in several respects, as follows. We plan to construct and perturb a joint distribution on all OD pairs [31], and then compare the subsequent optimization stability vs. the marginal distributions in this work. We also plan to quantify the change in performance when optimization utilizes the full predictive distributions instead of the currently common predictive means [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For future work, we plan to extend the current study in several respects, as follows. We plan to construct and perturb a joint distribution on all OD pairs [31], and then compare the subsequent optimization stability vs. the marginal distributions in this work. We also plan to quantify the change in performance when optimization utilizes the full predictive distributions instead of the currently common predictive means [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%