2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2010.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online querying of d-dimensional hierarchies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table (3) includes the cases and the results. As shown in table (2), it can be noted that in the cases 4, [6][7][8][9][10], 11, [14][15][16][17], 19, [20][21][22][23] and 25, the proposed query optimization approach has lower cost than SQL Server 2012 query optimizer. That is the relative cost of the proposed approach to SQL Server 2012 is between 0.38 (in case 4) and 1.03(in case 5).While such relative cost in the cases13,18, 20 and 24 the proposed query optimizer has a very little increase than SQL Server optimizer by just 0.01.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table (3) includes the cases and the results. As shown in table (2), it can be noted that in the cases 4, [6][7][8][9][10], 11, [14][15][16][17], 19, [20][21][22][23] and 25, the proposed query optimization approach has lower cost than SQL Server 2012 query optimizer. That is the relative cost of the proposed approach to SQL Server 2012 is between 0.38 (in case 4) and 1.03(in case 5).While such relative cost in the cases13,18, 20 and 24 the proposed query optimizer has a very little increase than SQL Server optimizer by just 0.01.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have to mention that, the query optimization step, [4] is the most critical step in query processing procedure [22], especially for complex queries, which often contains a large number of join operations [2]. Query optimization has two levels, the first level is the logical optimization and the second one concerns with physical optimization process [21].…”
Section: Optimization Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not possible for large data warehouses. For peer-to-peer networks, related work includes distributed methods for querying concept hierarchies such as [25], [26], [27], [28]. However, none of these methods provides real-time OLAP functionality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works in the field propose distributed warehousing systems [18,4,2], but the warehouse and its aggregation, update and querying functionality remain centralized. Recently, effort has been made to distribute the data warehouse itself by applying techniques from the field of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) computing [12], but with no a priori consideration for group-by queries. Moreover, none of these approaches deals with the query performance versus variable data availability or load skew.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%