2018
DOI: 10.1509/jmr.16.0243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Reputation Mechanisms and the Decreasing Value of Chain Affiliation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two factors moderate the substitution relationship. First, the relationship is stronger for independent hotels than for chains, consistent with prior research showing that online reviews have larger effects on independent hotels' sales than on chain hotels' sales (Hollenbeck 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two factors moderate the substitution relationship. First, the relationship is stronger for independent hotels than for chains, consistent with prior research showing that online reviews have larger effects on independent hotels' sales than on chain hotels' sales (Hollenbeck 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Luca (2016) shows, in addition, that the demand effect of online reviews is particularly strong for independent restaurants (compared to chain restaurants). In a similar vein, Hollenbeck (2018) shows that online reviews have significantly reduced the revenue premium enjoyed by hotel chains over independent hotels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There are many important areas where social interactions and brand interact, and there have been interesting enquiries within cultural boundaries. For example, Hollenbeck (2018) finds, in the context of hotels in the state of Texas, that as more online WOM has become available, individual nonchain properties have benefited from online reputation mechanisms and gained market share from branded hotel chains . This could imply that social interactions and WOM can be a substitute for brand-building through conventional means.…”
Section: Research Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We summarized the antecedents of online reputation in Table 2. [19] Prior research has shown that online reputation can be built through several alternative mechanisms, such as (1) online feedback [18,61,62], (2) social interactions [63], (3) past contributions [64], (4) quality of responses posted [21,22,64] and (5) trust between the online interacting parties [61]. In this study, we focus on two mechanisms including online feedback (i.e., private information sharing) and past contributions (i.e., doctor's public information sharing) on online reputation building.…”
Section: Individualmentioning
confidence: 99%