2021
DOI: 10.5815/ijem.2021.05.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online Signature Verification Using Fully Connected Deep Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, when the number of writers was 15, the machine learning algorithm was about 90%, but the effect was good and stable in the deep learning network. The selection of features by Yelmti et al is largely consistent with the features we used in the extraction of dynamic features [22] and, through correlation analysis, we know that the standard deviation and variance in velocity and other features have relatively low correlation. From the above discussion, we can see that this study is relatively comprehensive in feature extraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, when the number of writers was 15, the machine learning algorithm was about 90%, but the effect was good and stable in the deep learning network. The selection of features by Yelmti et al is largely consistent with the features we used in the extraction of dynamic features [22] and, through correlation analysis, we know that the standard deviation and variance in velocity and other features have relatively low correlation. From the above discussion, we can see that this study is relatively comprehensive in feature extraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Yelmati et al [22] obtained a total of 42 feature vectors containing static and dynamic features, such as average velocity, pen up/down ratio, maximum pressure, pressure range, x-velocity variance, signature width, signature height, etc. They obtained better accuracy and faster training time on the SVC2004 Dataset but used fewer static features and weak interpretability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%