2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online soft sensor design using local partial least squares models with adaptive process state partition

Abstract: We propose a soft sensing method using local partial least squares models with adaptive process state partition, referring to as the LPLS-APSP, which is capable of effectively handling time-varying characteristics and nonlinearities of processes, the two major adverse effects of common industrial processes that cause low-performance of soft sensors. In our proposed approach, statistical hypothesis testing is employed to adaptively partition the process state into the unique local model regions each consisting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicates well performance of sensor based on the top temperature and the one-step delayed of output. Equations (10) and (11) are applied for TF modeling. The following quasilinear equation shows the minimum error and maximum prediction accuracy and more appropriate performance indexes compared to others for debutanizer…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It indicates well performance of sensor based on the top temperature and the one-step delayed of output. Equations (10) and (11) are applied for TF modeling. The following quasilinear equation shows the minimum error and maximum prediction accuracy and more appropriate performance indexes compared to others for debutanizer…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] The statistical methods or soft computing have been applied in different data-based soft sensors. The most popular of them are multivariate statistical regression techniques include multiple linear regressions (MLRs), 9 partial least squares (PLS), [10][11][12] principal component analysis (PCA) model, [13][14][15] genetic fuzzy model, 16 support vector machine method, 17 artificial neural networks (ANN), 18 a combination with PCA model and ANN, 9,19,20 a PLS-radial basis function neural network-based model, 21 and a combination with linear regressions (LRs) model and ANN. 22 The data-based model has gained the reputation by extending the availability of the recorded data in the process industries and computational power on it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In industrial processes, it is necessary to obtain some key variables that cannot be measured through online estimation for better control and optimization, [19][20][21] so the method of soft sensor is developed. In recent years, the data-driven statistical regression soft sensor has been applied in chemical processes, such as principal component analysis, [22][23][24] partial least square, [25][26][27] artificial neural network, 28,29 support vector machine, 30,31 and just-in-time learning. [32][33][34] Considering the nonlinearities and time-varying characteristics, a soft sensor development based on supervised ensemble learning with improved process state partition is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we present and compare the predictive accuracy of five simple soft sensing strategies for regression tasks on multivariate chemical process data, using regression models developed on small moving windows. The widely used mean moving window [16], moving window partial least squares (PLS) [17], and moving window updated recursive partial least squares (RPLS) [12], were compared with moving window random forest regression (RF), and a novel, random forest-partial least squares regression ensemble (RF-PLS) method. These modeling approaches can be used in real-time applications for one or several-time-step ahead predictions for soft sensing with little a priori knowledge and with minimal assumptions about the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%