Online submission and peer‐review systems

Ware, Mark

doi:10.1087/095315105774648771

Cited by 90 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Reviewers are automatically reminded of manuscripts they agreed to review if they take longer than the agreed-upon time. Surveys of authors, editors, and reviewers indicate that the majority of people in all three roles prefer online manuscript management systems to e-mail systems (Ware 2005). After incorporating manuscript management systems, journals tend to experience 30% faster manuscript processing (i.e., reviews, revisions, etc.…”

Section: Online Manuscript Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After incorporating manuscript management systems, journals tend to experience 30% faster manuscript processing (i.e., reviews, revisions, etc. ), and 25% higher volume of submissions (Ware 2005). Our editors and reviewers will experience a learning curve as they get accustomed to this new system, but we anticipate it will result in faster, more efficient publication of The Canadian Field-Naturalist.…”

Section: Online Manuscript Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Online publication: A natural progression for <em>The Canadian Field-Naturalist</em>

Fitzsimmons¹

2011

Can Field Nat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Online Manuscript Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Online Manuscript Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Online publication: A natural progression for <em>The Canadian Field-Naturalist</em>

Fitzsimmons¹

2011

Can Field Nat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, the value added to the author's work by the efforts of publishers falls into two categories -the peer review process which authenticates the substantive content of the paper, and features such as copy-editing, design, the application of metadata, and so on, which make a paper more professional in appearance and function. Peer review is undertaken by members of the scholarly community, usually without payment, but it is usually organized and administered by paid publishing staff, often nowadays with the help of specialized software (Ware, 2005). It may be that the publishers provide other forms of value added, such as interactive discussion of published papers, enriched metadata and CrossRef links.…”

Section: Repositories -Institutional or Subject-basedand Their Futurementioning

confidence: 99%

How do we provide access to the content of scholarly research information?

Rowland¹

2005

Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Access to published scholarly research information can be achieved in a number of ways, of which traditional subscription-based publishing is only one, and not necessarily the most preferable. Authors need visibility and impact for their work, while institutions need to be able to obtain at an affordable cost -usually through their libraries -access to all the research papers needed by staff and students.While much has been achieved by bulk deals and consortial negotiation with publishers, it is now felt that open access journals, subject repositories and institutional repositories show potential, and their further development and deployment should be encouraged. Institutions and publishers need to investigate the potential of models that allow a graceful and sustainable transition from old to new paradigms.

show abstract

“…Cost reductions, streamlined review processes, shortened turnaround times for decisions, and broader user bases are just a few of the positive changes. 1 However, many have challenged the peer-review process on the basis of its fairness, accuracy, validity, reliability, and other limitations. 2,3 The STM journal community is therefore obliged to continue to look for more efficient approaches to strengthen the system in light of the goals of peer review.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%