2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Online unsupervised detection of structural changes using train–induced dynamic responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, in ongoing and future work, using the validated train–track–bridge dynamic model, the authors intend to develop an advanced methodology for structural damage identification based on artificial intelligence [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, in ongoing and future work, using the validated train–track–bridge dynamic model, the authors intend to develop an advanced methodology for structural damage identification based on artificial intelligence [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies demonstrate good results in railway defect detection using these approaches, namely, in the detection of train wheel damages, such as flats [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ], out-of-roundness [ 32 ], and squats and corrugation [ 33 ]. Typically, these damage identification techniques require several operations including [ 34 , 35 ]: (i) data acquisition, (ii) feature extraction, (iii) feature normalization, (iv) feature fusion, and (v) feature classification. Other innovative techniques for wheel flat fault detection include a time–frequency ridge estimation method [ 36 ] or a multiscale morphology analysis [ 29 ] that can effectively extract the influential features of signals from strong background noise and under variable speed conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Symbolic data, continuous wavelet transform [ 27 , 37 ], principal component analysis (PCA) [ 38 , 39 ], and autoregressive models [ 34 , 40 ] are examples of effective techniques for extracting damage-sensitive features for both static and dynamic monitoring. In applications where the measured quantity is acceleration, autoregressive models (AR) have been widely disseminated, and the autoregressive model with exogenous input (ARX) [ 35 ] shows a higher sensitivity to damage in relation to AR due to its ability to capture cross information between sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, different methods and models such as the application of modal reduction and mode superposition technique for efficient estimation of critical (highly stressed) areas in civil structures [24], spatial incompatibility filters [25], data mining [26], [27], artificial neural network [28], clustering analysis [8], genetic algorithm [29], deep learning [30], fuzzy logic [31], principal component analysis [32], Bayesian [33], support vector machine [34], particle swarm optimization [35], decision tree [36], regression analysis [37], remote sensing [38], unmanned aerial systems [39], [40], and anomaly detection [41] have been also applied in SHM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%