2012
DOI: 10.1121/1.4740496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Onset- and offset-specific effects in interaural level difference discrimination

Abstract: The relative sensitivity of human listeners to interaural level differences (ILDs) carried by the onsets, offsets, and interior portions of brief sounds was examined. Stimuli consisted of single 4000-Hz Gabor clicks (Gaussian-windowed tone bursts) or trains of 16 such clicks repeating at an interclick interval (ICI) of 2 or 5 ms. In separate conditions, ILDs favored the right ear by a constant amount for all clicks (condition RRRR) or a changing amount that was maximal at sound onset (condition R000), offset (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blauert (1972) tested detection of changes in ILDs that were sinusoidally modulated, but limitations of that study were noted by Grantham (1984), who posited the distinction between perception of specific directional changes versus non-specific “differences.” Grantham showed that ILD changes become less perceptible as they are more rapidly alternating and also when they are carried by lower-frequency noises. The relative weakness of binaural change detection was also shown by Stecker and Brown (2012), who used a train of Gabor pulses to explore perception of binaural cues at multiple timepoints during a stimulus. They found that ILD sensitivity was poorer at the middle of the sound compared to the onset and offset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Blauert (1972) tested detection of changes in ILDs that were sinusoidally modulated, but limitations of that study were noted by Grantham (1984), who posited the distinction between perception of specific directional changes versus non-specific “differences.” Grantham showed that ILD changes become less perceptible as they are more rapidly alternating and also when they are carried by lower-frequency noises. The relative weakness of binaural change detection was also shown by Stecker and Brown (2012), who used a train of Gabor pulses to explore perception of binaural cues at multiple timepoints during a stimulus. They found that ILD sensitivity was poorer at the middle of the sound compared to the onset and offset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…0R (p < 0.06). These results suggest that ILD cues are processed at both onset and offset (Stecker and Brown, 2012).…”
Section: A Threshold Differences In No-interference Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Regardless of the type of threshold calculation, significantly greater interference was observed in condition R0 than RR (p < 0.01) or 0R (p < 0.03), a result that runs counter to the hypothesis of reduced interference for cues at sound onset. Instead, the results suggest that late-arriving cues continue to play an important role in ILD discrimination (Stecker and Brown, 2012), even in the presence of an effective diotic interferer. BII did not differ significantly between condition 0R and RR (p < 0.4).…”
Section: Similar Interference For Target Ild Presented At Sound Onmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Our data for low-frequency pure tones appear consistent with at 1000 Hz, but with Stecker and Brown (2010) at lower frequencies (250 Hz). Stecker and Brown (2012) suggested that the discrepancies between these studies resulted from effects of onset and offset weighting in ILD processing (i.e., "U-shaped" temporal weighting functions, Stecker and Hafter, 2009). It is possible that similar issues pertain to the current data, although the stimuli and frequency range are quite different.…”
Section: A Comparison Of Binaural Sensitivity At Sound Onsets and Ofmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…However, Stecker and Brown (2010) found no evidence for specific onset weighting in ILD, despite using stimuli (4000-Hz click trains) similar to those of . Results of that and a follow-up study which compared the weighting of ILD carried by onsets, offsets, and interior portions of sounds (Stecker and Brown, 2012) suggest that ILD cues near sound offset are strongly weighted, unlike the case for ITD, where the onset dominates more completely. Here, we investigate whether similar differences between ITD and ILD exist for low-frequency pure tones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%