“…In addition, the difference in crustal thickness between the northern and southern Parameterized as well as 2-D and 3-D convection models (Breuer & Moore, 2015) of the thermal evolution of Mars have been used to explain, for example, the formation of the crustal thickness dichotomy, the formation of a super plume underneath Tharsis (e.g., Golabek et al, 2011;Keller & Tackley, 2009;Roberts & Zhong, 2006), and the magmatic and crust formation history (e.g., Breuer & Spohn, 2006;Fraeman & Korenaga, 2010;Hauck & Phillips, 2002;Morschhauser et al, 2011;Ruedas et al, 2013). Other mantle convection models studied the cooling and solidification of a putative liquid magma ocean (e.g., Elkins-Tanton et al, 2005;Maurice et al, 2017;Tosi, Plesa, et al, 2013) and the effects of large-scale impacts on the interior dynamics (e.g., Roberts & Arkani-Hamed, 2017;Ruedas & Breuer, 2017). In this study we compare the results of the largest set of numerical simulations to date of the thermal evolution of Mars in 3-D spherical geometry with available observations in order to identify key parameters that control the interior evolution.…”