2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2021.106432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Onshore flow characteristics of the 1755 CE Lisbon tsunami: Linking forward and inverse numerical modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Forward models, on the other hand, combine hydrodynamic and sediment-transport models (including erosion and deposition) to simulate observed sedimentary deposits (e.g., grain-size and spatial-thickness distribution) (Apotsos et al, 2011). The successful combination of inverse and forward modeling in the 1755 CE Lisbon tsunami confirms the potential to improve understanding of historical events (Bosnic et al, 2021). Although, little attention has been drawn to the quantification of tsunami erosion in the nearshore area to date (Yoshikawa et al, 2015), Goto, Takahashi, et al (2011) determined severely impaired stability of coastal infrastructures due to strong localized scouring and sediment rearrangement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Forward models, on the other hand, combine hydrodynamic and sediment-transport models (including erosion and deposition) to simulate observed sedimentary deposits (e.g., grain-size and spatial-thickness distribution) (Apotsos et al, 2011). The successful combination of inverse and forward modeling in the 1755 CE Lisbon tsunami confirms the potential to improve understanding of historical events (Bosnic et al, 2021). Although, little attention has been drawn to the quantification of tsunami erosion in the nearshore area to date (Yoshikawa et al, 2015), Goto, Takahashi, et al (2011) determined severely impaired stability of coastal infrastructures due to strong localized scouring and sediment rearrangement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Numerical models are useful when studying the sediment deposition that occurs as a result of a tsunami. Those models can be forward models (Bosnic et al, 2021; Sugawara et al, 2014) or inverse models (Jaffe et al, 2012; Mitra et al, 2020; Spiske et al, 2010; Tehranirad et al, 2021) whereby flow quantities are derived from the sediments. The methods in the inverse models rely on either a necessarily simplified model of sediment transport and settling (Jaffe et al, 2012; Tehranirad et al, 2021) or machine learning to obtain data from a large database of hypothetical deposits (Mitra et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods in the inverse models rely on either a necessarily simplified model of sediment transport and settling (Jaffe et al, 2012; Tehranirad et al, 2021) or machine learning to obtain data from a large database of hypothetical deposits (Mitra et al, 2020). However, linking both forward and inverse models can give greater insights into the resulting sedimentary deposition than a single approach only (Bosnic et al, 2021). Regardless of the type of approach taken, a key part of any interpretation is a thorough understanding of the depositional mechanisms that occur during tsunami inundation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, various theoretical models must be quantified to obtain the expected added value (e.g., [9][10][11]). The topics and use cases range from the analysis of impacts in the case of prevalent ex-post assessment of tsunami hazards and related damages [12] to the maximum earthquake magnitude scenario [13], analysis of historical events such as the 1755 CE Lisbon earthquake and the largest historical tsunami ever impacting the Europe's Atlantic coasts [14], or confirming the existence of low-level tsunamis [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%