1990
DOI: 10.1016/0308-0161(90)90096-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontario hydro's leak-before-break approach to Darlington NGS heat transport system piping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most recent methodology developed to prevent catastrophic failure is centred on the concept of leak‐before‐break (LBB). This concept, which demonstrates through fracture mechanics that there is a negligible chance of catastrophic failure prior to leakage, has been widely used in nuclear power plants for the design of a primary heat transport system (PHTS) 1–4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent methodology developed to prevent catastrophic failure is centred on the concept of leak‐before‐break (LBB). This concept, which demonstrates through fracture mechanics that there is a negligible chance of catastrophic failure prior to leakage, has been widely used in nuclear power plants for the design of a primary heat transport system (PHTS) 1–4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LBB assessment was ®rst introduced by large power industries such as Ontario Hydro [1] in an attempt to provide con®dence in the assessment of piping integrity without the presence of design features for pipe-whip restraints and jet impingement shields. In this case, the design of the LBB assessment focused on the driving loads acting on the piping system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two reports published by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1993 and 1994 present the application of LBB in different countries [5], [21]. Other publications also provide examples of LBB applications or developments in other countries, for example France [22], [23], Belgium [24], USA [17], Canada [25], [26], Korea [27], India [28] or Czech Republic [29] where the following procedures were used with slight modifications.…”
Section: Nuclear Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%