2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10228-017-0581-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogenetic and seasonal changes in the diet of the halfbeak Zenarchopterus dunckeri at Iriomote Island, southern Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pronounced foraging tactic of common halfbeak to target prey (Hymnoptera) is similar the registered by Delabie et al (2006), and is thus presumed to be related to the presence of insects on the seawater surface. This behaviour has been registered by other Hemiramphidae across different habitats (Tabassum et al 2017;Abidin et al 2019), where insects were ingested in proximity to oating objects or sucked from the water surface (Kanai et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The pronounced foraging tactic of common halfbeak to target prey (Hymnoptera) is similar the registered by Delabie et al (2006), and is thus presumed to be related to the presence of insects on the seawater surface. This behaviour has been registered by other Hemiramphidae across different habitats (Tabassum et al 2017;Abidin et al 2019), where insects were ingested in proximity to oating objects or sucked from the water surface (Kanai et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Another halfbeak species, Zenarchopterus dunckeri, has been reported to change its diet as it grows in nature. In general, juvenile fish feed more on zooplankton and small gastropods, while larger juveniles feed land insects, such as ants and flies (Kanai et al, 2017). In another halfbeak species, Hemiramphus far, is known as an omnivorous fish, as it feeds on fish, isopods, ostracods, Daphnia, shellfish, algae, and unidentified parts of plants and animals (Tabassum et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%