1997
DOI: 10.1086/297510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ontogenetic Contingency and Floral Morphology: The Effects of Architecture and Resource Limitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
134
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
134
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the size of successive flowers increases along the inflorescences of some taxa (e.g. Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae), [10]; Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae), [11]), a pattern inconsistent with this hypothesis. Moreover, if proximal to distal decline were a general feature of inflorescences, such variation should affect the sizes of all organs of each flower, but this is often not the case.…”
Section: Intra-individual Variation Among Metamers Is Commonmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the size of successive flowers increases along the inflorescences of some taxa (e.g. Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae), [10]; Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae), [11]), a pattern inconsistent with this hypothesis. Moreover, if proximal to distal decline were a general feature of inflorescences, such variation should affect the sizes of all organs of each flower, but this is often not the case.…”
Section: Intra-individual Variation Among Metamers Is Commonmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At the same time, flower morphology and functionality are dependent upon the ontogenetic development, which was described by Diggle (1997). Notably, the eggplant is characterised by flower heteromorphology, abundant flowering and frequent dropping of flowers or fruitlets.…”
Section: Plant Biology and Environmental Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those experiments designed specifically to discriminate between plasticity and 'metamorphosis' demonstrated that some part of the variation routinely attributed to plasticity of resource allocation was, in fact, due to inherent differences among flowers and fruits within inflorescence axes. While such variation falls within the definition of metamorphosis, I have termed the inherent variation within axes 'architectural effects' in recognition of the association of this variation with the position of the flower, fruit, or other structures within the overall architecture of a plant (Diggle, 1995(Diggle, , 1997b(Diggle, , 2002). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of intra-inflorescence variation produced by plasticity and by 'metamorphosis' may be identical, and only careful experimentation can reveal the actual source of morphological or functional variation. Perhaps even more significant to the study of plasticity, similar experiments with Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) have demonstrated that architectural effects may not only mimic plasticity, as for example in S. hirtum and F. virginiana but may mask the true magnitude of plasticity, and/or cause misinterpretation of the direction of plasticity (Diggle, 1997b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation